05.06.2013 Views

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> size measurement, and second it can only <strong>model</strong> mean<br />

individuals.<br />

If least-square regression is influenced by <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

dependent variable used to quantify size in time, what is a good<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> size? Is it a linear measurement (height, width, diameter,<br />

etc…) or is it a volume, a weight, or any o<strong>the</strong>r tri-dimensional measure? It<br />

could also be a two-dimensional measure such as, e.g., <strong>the</strong> surface covered<br />

by a colony <strong>of</strong> sponges or corals. Is <strong>the</strong>re a privileged dimension (1, 2 or<br />

3D) to measure growth? Except for changes in <strong>the</strong> curve shape due to<br />

distortion introduced by a power transformation –compare von<br />

Bertalanffy's <strong>model</strong> in size and in weight (von Bertalanffy, 1957, his<br />

Fig. 3, and Fig. 10 p 47)–, no criterion exists for choosing <strong>the</strong> best<br />

dimension to describe growth. Accordingly, a length, a surface or a<br />

volume/weight can each be acceptable, and <strong>the</strong> final choice will be<br />

dictated by practical considerations: which measurement is <strong>the</strong> easiest to<br />

obtain with <strong>the</strong> highest possible accuracy (see Grosjean et al, 1999, see<br />

Part II, for a discussion <strong>of</strong> this problem in P. lividus). Thus if a regression<br />

method is highly sensitive to power transformation, it will be less desirable<br />

because results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regression will vary according to <strong>the</strong> measure used.<br />

By contrast, <strong>the</strong> median, as well as <strong>the</strong> quantiles, are insensitive to power<br />

transformation. Hence, quantile regression is generally insensitive to any<br />

transformation by a monotonous function (Koenker, 2001) and will not be<br />

influenced by <strong>the</strong> dimension (1, 2 or 3D) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dependent measurement.<br />

Accordingly, a median individual in a regression <strong>of</strong> length against time<br />

will remain <strong>the</strong> same median individual in a regression <strong>of</strong> a volume (as<br />

length 3 , or any allometry coefficient) against time with a quantile<br />

regression, while this is not true for a mean individual using a least-square<br />

regression. Using median/quantiles instead <strong>of</strong> mean allows remaining <strong>the</strong><br />

independence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong> size measurement in a context where <strong>the</strong><br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studied phenomenon (growth) is undetermined. As<br />

suggested by von Bertalanffy (1938, 1957), growth could be a<br />

multidimensional process, since it is a balance between anabolism (with<br />

Part IV: A growth <strong>model</strong> with intraspecific competition<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!