Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews
Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews
Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> size measurement, and second it can only <strong>model</strong> mean<br />
individuals.<br />
If least-square regression is influenced by <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
dependent variable used to quantify size in time, what is a good<br />
measurement <strong>of</strong> size? Is it a linear measurement (height, width, diameter,<br />
etc…) or is it a volume, a weight, or any o<strong>the</strong>r tri-dimensional measure? It<br />
could also be a two-dimensional measure such as, e.g., <strong>the</strong> surface covered<br />
by a colony <strong>of</strong> sponges or corals. Is <strong>the</strong>re a privileged dimension (1, 2 or<br />
3D) to measure growth? Except for changes in <strong>the</strong> curve shape due to<br />
distortion introduced by a power transformation –compare von<br />
Bertalanffy's <strong>model</strong> in size and in weight (von Bertalanffy, 1957, his<br />
Fig. 3, and Fig. 10 p 47)–, no criterion exists for choosing <strong>the</strong> best<br />
dimension to describe growth. Accordingly, a length, a surface or a<br />
volume/weight can each be acceptable, and <strong>the</strong> final choice will be<br />
dictated by practical considerations: which measurement is <strong>the</strong> easiest to<br />
obtain with <strong>the</strong> highest possible accuracy (see Grosjean et al, 1999, see<br />
Part II, for a discussion <strong>of</strong> this problem in P. lividus). Thus if a regression<br />
method is highly sensitive to power transformation, it will be less desirable<br />
because results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regression will vary according to <strong>the</strong> measure used.<br />
By contrast, <strong>the</strong> median, as well as <strong>the</strong> quantiles, are insensitive to power<br />
transformation. Hence, quantile regression is generally insensitive to any<br />
transformation by a monotonous function (Koenker, 2001) and will not be<br />
influenced by <strong>the</strong> dimension (1, 2 or 3D) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dependent measurement.<br />
Accordingly, a median individual in a regression <strong>of</strong> length against time<br />
will remain <strong>the</strong> same median individual in a regression <strong>of</strong> a volume (as<br />
length 3 , or any allometry coefficient) against time with a quantile<br />
regression, while this is not true for a mean individual using a least-square<br />
regression. Using median/quantiles instead <strong>of</strong> mean allows remaining <strong>the</strong><br />
independence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong> size measurement in a context where <strong>the</strong><br />
dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studied phenomenon (growth) is undetermined. As<br />
suggested by von Bertalanffy (1938, 1957), growth could be a<br />
multidimensional process, since it is a balance between anabolism (with<br />
Part IV: A growth <strong>model</strong> with intraspecific competition<br />
145