05.06.2013 Views

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

General conclusions<br />

In this classification, all <strong>model</strong>s derive from simplest forms described<br />

by <strong>the</strong> general differential equation y' = ay m - by n , that is, a damped<br />

exponential growth with <strong>the</strong> first term being <strong>the</strong> limiting factor and <strong>the</strong><br />

second one representing <strong>the</strong> exponential growth (Fletcher, 1974; Mueller-<br />

Feuga, 1990). The various forms <strong>of</strong> basic growth <strong>model</strong>s are obtained from<br />

different particular values for m and n. With m = 1 and n = 1, we obtain <strong>the</strong><br />

exponential growth, which is a simple indeterminate growth <strong>model</strong>. If<br />

m = 0 and n = 1, we get <strong>the</strong> von Bertalanffy 1 <strong>model</strong> (von Bertal. 1),<br />

which seems to be <strong>the</strong> simplest determinate growth <strong>model</strong> for individuals.<br />

If m = 1 and n = 2, we obtain <strong>the</strong> logistic curve, which is probably <strong>the</strong><br />

simplest determinate growth <strong>model</strong> for populations (Verhulst, 1838). It is<br />

not clear if o<strong>the</strong>r solutions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> differential equation could be considered<br />

as useful roots in <strong>the</strong> classification. Some solutions correspond to more<br />

complex <strong>model</strong>s that are best placed in a stem instead <strong>of</strong> as a root in this<br />

classification. For instance, using m = 2/3 and n = 1, we obtain <strong>the</strong> von<br />

Bertalanffy 2 <strong>model</strong> that we prefer to position inside <strong>the</strong> "von Bertalanffy<br />

1 family" (see Fig. 35). Some authors have generalized this differential<br />

equation (Fletcher, 1974; Schnute, 1981) to a point that it describes almost<br />

all existing <strong>model</strong>s. Our concern here is just to derive <strong>the</strong> simplest <strong>model</strong>s<br />

as roots <strong>of</strong> our classification tree and consider a di- or a polychotomous<br />

system to position more complex <strong>model</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> tree as generalizations <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> simplest root <strong>model</strong>s. One should consider each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simplest <strong>model</strong>s<br />

as <strong>the</strong> root <strong>of</strong> a distinct tree. However, in our presentation (Fig. 35), we<br />

mixed all existing <strong>model</strong>s in a single tree for conciseness (because, except<br />

for <strong>the</strong> "von Bertalanffy 1 family", <strong>the</strong> trees would not been much<br />

populated).<br />

Starting from those simplest <strong>model</strong>s, one could consider a first<br />

dichotomous separation: monophasic versus polyphasic <strong>model</strong>s. While<br />

<strong>the</strong> group <strong>of</strong> monophasic <strong>model</strong>s is more populated (because <strong>the</strong>y probably<br />

represent more common growth processes), <strong>the</strong> second group contains two<br />

items:<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!