05.06.2013 Views

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

Growth model of the reared sea urchin Paracentrotus ... - SciViews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

General introduction<br />

Russell, 1987; Rowley, 1990; Kenner, 1992; Ebert & Russell, 1992, 1993;<br />

Russell et al, 1998; Lamare & Mladenov, 2000). This way, <strong>sea</strong>sonal<br />

variation in growth is also partly eliminated. For <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong>s, it is <strong>the</strong><br />

skeleton that is tagged using tetracycline (Kobayashi & Taki, 1969; Taki,<br />

1972). Size increase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ossicles can <strong>the</strong>n be determined because a band<br />

<strong>of</strong> tetracycline-labeled skeleton, visible under ultraviolet light, indicates its<br />

size at tagging time. An allometric relationship between <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

given ossicles and <strong>the</strong> body size allow estimating <strong>the</strong> latter. To fit such<br />

data, growth <strong>model</strong>s need to be reworked, using a so-called Ford-Walford<br />

representation, or Walford plot (Ford, 1933; Walford, 1946; Ebert, 1999)<br />

where size at time t + 1 year (at recapture) is expressed as a function <strong>of</strong><br />

size at time t (at capture). Ebert (1999) reviewed such transformations for<br />

von Bertalanffy, Gompertz, logistic, Richards and Tanaka <strong>model</strong>s.<br />

Sainsbury (1980) demonstrated <strong>the</strong> strong biases that could occur with<br />

such a method when <strong>the</strong>re is individual variation in growth in a population.<br />

In fact, relative growth does not take <strong>the</strong> age into account, by definition.<br />

Hence, due to individual variations in growth rate, some fast-growing but<br />

young individuals have same size as slower-growing but older ones at a<br />

given time. The method mixes all animals having <strong>the</strong> same size, no matter<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir age, and calculates a mean growth rate at that size. This mixing <strong>of</strong><br />

age-cohorts is troublesome when growth variation is high in <strong>the</strong><br />

population. Rejection <strong>of</strong> a particular growth <strong>model</strong> could result from <strong>the</strong>se<br />

biases as Sainsbury evidenced, using a <strong>the</strong>oretical analysis with <strong>the</strong> von<br />

Bertalanffy 1 <strong>model</strong>. As individual variation in growth pattern is probable,<br />

one should be very careful using this method. Among all authors using<br />

tagged <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong>s, Gage (1992) was <strong>the</strong> only one that cited Sainsbury's<br />

work and care about a possible bias due to individual variation in growth<br />

rate.<br />

Clearly, <strong>the</strong>re is no fool-pro<strong>of</strong> method for <strong>model</strong>ling individual growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>urchin</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> field. In such a context, one can rely on experiments<br />

conducted in aquaria, although it is evident that growth patterns observed<br />

in artificial conditions could be very different to what happens in <strong>the</strong> field.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!