15.06.2013 Views

View A43-1112-1979-eng.pdf

View A43-1112-1979-eng.pdf

View A43-1112-1979-eng.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EDIBLE AND POISONOUS MUSHROOMS OF CANADA<br />

Suppose we have a specimen to be identified. The first choice in the key<br />

(p. 29) is based on the character of the lamellae and in this specimen they are<br />

thin, well developed and crowded, so we go to choice 2. We check the spore<br />

deposit and find it is colored, so we go to choice 25. Here there are five choices<br />

and we find our specimen has a pink spore deposit, so we go to choice 26. It<br />

has a central stipe, which takes us to choice 27, and the lamellae are free from<br />

the stipe, which carries us to 28. There is no trace of an annulus or volva, so<br />

we come to Pluteus and turn to the key to the species of this genus (p.<br />

1 65).<br />

The pileus is brown and the lamellae do not have a black edge so we arrive at<br />

Pluteus cervinus, and on comparing our specimen with the description we find<br />

it matches and we can conclude that we have identified the species.<br />

If the specimen had had a yellow pileus and stipe we would similarly<br />

have checked Pluteus admirabilis but a specimen with a yellow pileus and white<br />

stipe would have caused diflftculty. Another reference book might show that<br />

there is a species of Pluteus with a yellow cap and white stipe, P. leoninus, that<br />

is not described in this book. But it would have been wrong to assume that we<br />

had found P. admirabilis because it keyed out here, when the description of<br />

P. admirabilis called for a yellow stipe and our specimen had a white one.<br />

A key thus has its limitations but if used critically and with caution it<br />

should be of great assistance in identifying the specimens collected.<br />

If other methods of identification fail it is sometimes possible to send<br />

specimens to specialists and have them identified. In the Canada Department<br />

of Agriculture we do not have the staff or the time available to undertake<br />

identifications on a large scale. However, for the beginner who may wish to<br />

check on the identification of some common species of which he is uncertain,<br />

or for the more advanced student who thinks he may have found some rare or<br />

unusual species of special interest, we try to provide all the assistance possible.<br />

Fresh specimens may be sent in by mail and if they are not too long in<br />

transit and are not overmature, worm-eaten, or decayed, they often arrive in<br />

good condition. Specimens wrapped in tissue paper or newspaper which will<br />

absorb excess moisture arrive in better condition than those wrapped in<br />

waxed paper or packed in tin cans. Under these latter conditions moisture<br />

accumulates and bacterial decay sets in. Species of Coprinus do not travel well<br />

by mail and usually arrive as an inky mess.<br />

Specimens of mushrooms should never be preserved in fluid or sent in for<br />

identification in fluid. They are almost impossible to identify when preserved<br />

in this way.<br />

It is much preferable when sending material in for identification to take<br />

careful notes on the fresh condition, then dry the specimens and send them in<br />

the dried condition. If properly dried they will keep indefinitely and with good<br />

notes they can be identified just about as readily as in the fresh condition.<br />

Furthermore, there is the advantage to us that if they prove to be an interesting<br />

species the dried specimens can be placed in the herbarium and become part of<br />

the permanent scientific record.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!