15.06.2013 Views

View A43-1112-1979-eng.pdf

View A43-1112-1979-eng.pdf

View A43-1112-1979-eng.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EDIBLE AND POISONOUS MUSHROOMS OF CANADA<br />

CANTHARELLUS<br />

Cantharellus is an important genus for the mycophagist because many of<br />

the species are large and conspicuous, and fairly easily recognized without<br />

much danger of being confused with poisonous species. The chanterelle,<br />

C. cibarius, is one of the species frequently used and highly recommended for<br />

food and should be on the Hst of every amateur collector.<br />

The genus is characterized by the thick, fold-like lamellae which are<br />

decurrent, usually distant and more or less forked. The stipe is continuous<br />

with the pileus and there is no veil. In some species the lamellae are poorly<br />

developed and little more than wrinkles. The genus then approaches Craterellus<br />

of the Thelephoraceae in which the hymenium is smooth. Cantharellus clava-<br />

tus, in which the lamellae are mere wrinkles, has been placed in Craterellus by<br />

some authors. On the other hand, in species in which the lamellae are better<br />

developed and less fold-like, the genus approaches Clitocybe. Cantharellus<br />

umbonatus with well-formed lamellae is hkely to be sought in Clitocybe, and<br />

Clitocybe aurantiaca has been called Cantharellus aurantiacus by many authors.<br />

For those who are interested in the problems of relationships, it may be<br />

noted that modern taxonomists tend to the view that Cantharellus, as here<br />

constituted, does not comprise a natural group of species. For example,<br />

C. multiplex, with its pecuhar warted spores, has been made the type of a new<br />

genus, Polyozellus; and C. umbonatus, with amyloid spores, has been made the<br />

type of a new genus, Cantharellula. Although it is evident from modern taxonomic<br />

studies that these and other species are not closely related to C. cibarius,<br />

which is the type species of Cantharellus, it seems preferable to retain Can-<br />

tharellus in the more traditional sense for the purpose of this book. If Can-<br />

tharellus were to be used in the strict sense for only those species closely<br />

related to C. cibarius, it might be considered to be more closely related to the<br />

Clavariaceae than to the Agaricaceae.<br />

Key<br />

1. Fruiting bodies entirely red C. cinnabarinus<br />

1. Fruiting bodies not entirely red 2<br />

2. Fruiting bodies more or less yellow to brown 3<br />

2. Fruiting bodies not yellow 5<br />

3. Fruiting bodies large, vase-shaped, yellowish, with reddish<br />

or reddish orange scales C. floccosus<br />

3. Fruiting bodies not as above 4<br />

4. Fruiting bodies bright chrome-yellow to egg-yellow, firm, fleshy C cibarius<br />

4. Fruiting bodies brownish yellow to ochraceous brown, thin, pliant;<br />

lamellae drying grayish C. tubaeformis<br />

5. Fruiting bodies gray, usually with a small umbo; lamellae well developed,<br />

white; flesh reddening when wounded C umbonatus<br />

5. Fruiting bodies purplish flesh color to blackish 6<br />

6. Growing in dense cespitose masses; spores nearly globose, warty C. multiplex<br />

6. Usually separate to gregarious or sometimes slightly cespitose;<br />

32<br />

spores narrow-ellipsoid, wrinkled C. clavatus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!