17.06.2013 Views

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 2:10-cv-07678-JFW-DTB Document 57-3 Filed 09/28/11 Page 12 of 37 Page ID<br />

#:952 NAN04745 I<br />

Application/Control Number: 10/405,112 Page 3<br />

Art Unit: 2625<br />

5. Claims 82-152 and 154-166 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) based upon a<br />

public use or sale of the invention. In the broad statement in the declaration, it appears<br />

to suggest that the device was utilized for its purposes to print items coincident with its<br />

use. The purpose of the invention is to provide vouchers in e gaming environment or<br />

receipts to customers in a vending environment. Therefore, based on this bi'oad<br />

statement, the Examiner concluded that the invention has been used in a manner that<br />

coincides with "public use". However, a proper response to the questions below can<br />

further clarify if the invention was "on sale" or in "pubic use".<br />

6. An issue of public use or on sale activity has been raised in this application. In<br />

order for the examiner to properly consider patentability of the claimed invention under<br />

35 U.S.C. 102(b), additional information regarding this issue is required as follows:<br />

On the third page of the declaration, the inventor stated that "After being built, the<br />

promotional pnnter was placed into operation and used for its intended purpose....".<br />

Based on the above statement, the Examiner would like ask for more clarification as to<br />

the period in which the invention was in operation. When the invention was placed into<br />

operation, was the invention on display to anyone other than the inventor? Was the use<br />

of the invention strictly for testing purposes? Was the operation of the invention in a<br />

place where the public could view the structural features of the claimed invention while<br />

i<br />

in operation? As discussed earlier in a conversation with Attorney of record Frank Cite,<br />

the Examiner understood that FutureLogic, Inc has created products for use by other<br />

corporations. Has the claimed invention in question been used by another person or<br />

party other than the inventor to use the invention without limitation, restriction or I<br />

I<br />

00033<br />

Nanoptix' Summary Judgment Exhibit No. 3<br />

-A0172-<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

!<br />

I<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!