17.06.2013 Views

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i<br />

i<br />

I<br />

1<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i<br />

I<br />

I<br />

!<br />

t<br />

1<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

Gas<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

l0<br />

1 l<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

2:10-cv-07678-JFW-DTB Document 58 Filed 09/28111 Page 9 of 21 Page ID<br />

#:1136<br />

me. At that time, it wasn't my responsibility to hold those NDAs. They were kind of<br />

turned over to our document control system prior to that, I suspect, because we<br />

upgraded that probably in the mid -- or early to mid 2000s, but that would have<br />

been the general repository site. I really don't know -- remember searching for it or<br />

seeing it.<br />

Meyerhofer Depo. Vol. I at 104:6-10:<br />

BY MR. ROUNDS: Let me show you what I've marked as Exhibit 113, which is a<br />

March 7, 1996, letter from yourself to Mr. Uland. Do you have that in front of you?<br />

A. Yes.<br />

Meyerhofer Depo. Vol. I at 105:1-24:<br />

Q. BY MR. ROUNDS: Are you ready to proceed, Mr. Meyerhofer?<br />

A. Yes. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to talk to counsel. I-- what I<br />

wanted to state about this document I discovered this as part of my examination of<br />

the record going back. This date is -- there is a typo, and the typo is in the year. It's<br />

actually '97 from what I could tell by reconstructing the timeline and<br />

correspondence with Dave Uland and the like. And I couldn't -- I was trying to<br />

resolve it because it was such -- it was earlier -- specifically earlier than the bulk of<br />

all the other documents, and yet from all the notebook communications I have, it<br />

was in -- it was in this time frame, exactly in '97, and not '96, so that's why I wanted<br />

to bring that up. I believe that's a typo.<br />

Q. Okay. Well, thank you for that clarification.<br />

A. Okay.<br />

Q. To summarize then, you believe that the proper date for Exhibit 113 is March<br />

7th of 1997 as opposed to March 7th of 1996; is that fair?<br />

A. That's correct.<br />

Nanoptix'<br />

Excerpts of<br />

Deposition<br />

-A0304-<br />

-9-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!