Joint Appendix One

I Case2:10-cv-07678-JFW-DTB Document14 Filed12/27/10 Page5of8 PagelD#:74
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
i
I
i
I
i0
ii
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
because Plaintiff is organized and governed by the laws of California, and because
of this already-pending action initiated by Plaintiff.
27. Venue for these counterclaims is proper in this judicial district
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b).
28.
concerning infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,594,855 (the '"855 patent").
29. Nanoptix restates and incorporates the allegations contained in
paragraphs 1-5 of this counterclaim.
30. Nanoptix is not infringing, and has not infringed, either by direct
infringement, contributory infringement, or induced infringement, any claims of the
'855 patent.
SECOND COUNTERCLAIM
(Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity)
31. An actual case or controversy exists between Nanoptix and Plaintiff
concerning invalidity of the '855 patent.
32. Nanoptix restates and incorporates the allegations contained in
paragraphs 1-5 of this counterclaim.
33. All of the claims of the '855 patent are invalid under one or more
sections of the Patent Act, including (but not limited to) 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102,
103, or 112.
its favor that:
NANOPTIX'S PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Wherefore, Nanoptix respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in
(a)
(b)
FIRST COUNTERCLAIM
(Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement)
An actual case or controversy exists between Nanoptix and Plaintiff
Nanoptix is not infringing and has not ini'ringed any claim
of the '855 patent;
all claims of the '855 are invalid and/or unenforceable;
-A0090-
" 4 " ,%NSWt_I'I. OF NANOI'TIX. IN["