Joint Appendix One

I_r
I
I
I
|
i
!
i
i
I
|
I
I
i
I
I
!
I
!
Case 2:10-cv-O7678-JFW-DTB Document 57-4 Filed 09/28/11 Page 37 of 38
#:1014
Application/Control Number: 10/405,112 Page 32
Art Unit: 2625
master controller for contro!ling, the operations of the gaming machine (20) which
receives commands through a communication link to generate a "¢omp" receipt from the
reward system host (44);see col. 3, lines 35-55).
However, Rowe '320 fails to disclose the generating of a voucher using voucher
data in parallel with generating a coupon.
However, this limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Katz. Katz
discloses the processor is further adapted to conduct couponlng activities in serial with
vouchering activities (i,e..in figure 7, there are a multiplicity'of steps that can be
performed in series or parallel. Rowe '320 modified _y Weiss '377 has a processor that
can conduct couponing activities with vouchering activities and now with Katz, this
combination allows for these activ'ities to be done in parallel; see fig. 7;paragraph
[0068]).
Therefore, in view of Katz, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in
the art at the time the invention was made to generate a voucher using voucher data in
parallel with generating a coupon in order to perform the activities togetherin respect to
one another (as stated in Katz paragraph [0068]).
7. Claims 89, 93, 94, 99, 101-103, 124, 128, 130, 134, 136-138, 153 and 162 are
rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Rowe '320 in view of Weiss
(US"Pat 6511377).
Re claim 89: The teachings of Rowe '320 are disclosed above,
However, Rowe '320 fails to disclose the gaming promotional printer,' wherein the
00095
Nanoptix' Summary Judgment ExhibitNo. 3
-A0234-
Page ID
NAN05100