Joint Appendix One

I
I
i
i
I
I
l
I
I
i
i
i
I
I
I
|
I
I
I
Case 2:10-cv-O7678-JFW-DTB Document 57-4 Filed 09/28/11 Page 25 of 38 Page ID
#: 1002 NAN04979
Application/Control Number: 10/405,112 Page 35
Art Unit: 2625
communication link to generate a "comp" receipt from the reward system host (44); see
col, 3, lines 35-55).
However, Rowe '320 in view of Rowe '527 fails to disclose the generating of a
voucher using voucher data in parallel with pdnting a coupon.
However, this limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Katz. Katz
discloses the processor is further adapte d to conduct couponing activities in serial with
vouchering activities (i.e. in figure 7, there are amultiplicity of steps that can be
performed in series or parallel. Rowe '320 modified by Weiss '377 has a processor that
can conduct couponing activities with vouchering activities and now with Katz, this
combination allows for these activities to be done in parallel; see fig. 7; paragraph
[0068]).
Therefore, in view of Katz, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in
the art at the time the invention was made to generate a voucher using voucher data in
parallel with printing a coupon in order to perform the activities together in respect to
one another (as stated in Katz paragraph [0068]).
9. Claims 89, 93, 94, 99, 101-103, 124, 128, 130, 134, 136-138, 153 and 162 are
rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over'Rowe '320, as modified by
Rowe '527, and further in view of Weiss (US Pat 6511377).
Re claim 89: The teachings of Rowe '320 in view of Rowe '527 are disclosed abm;e.
However, Rowe '320 in view of Rowe '527 fails to disclose the gaming
promotional printer, wherein the processor is further adapted to receive the trigger from
00083
Nanoptix' Summary JudgmentExhibitNo. 3
-A0222-