17.06.2013 Views

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 2:10-cv-07678-JFW-DTB Document 64-3 Filed 10/07/11<br />

#:1246<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

FutureLogic for 24 VM printers at $850 each.<br />

printers.<br />

47.<br />

Page8of10 PagelD<br />

By March 10, 2000, Futurelogic had produced at least fifteen VM<br />

48. After receipt of Coca-Cola's April 2000 purchase order, on or about<br />

April 14, 2000, Futurelogic shipped the 24 VM Printers to Coca-Cola. Invoices for<br />

these units were issued by FutureLogic on April 17, 18 and 20, 2000, respectively,<br />

to Coca-Cola.<br />

49. Futurelogic was not privy to the locations or the models of the vending<br />

machines in which Coca-Cola installed the printers for use in the field.<br />

50. Coca-Cola placed the 24 VM printers at locations throughout<br />

Cincinnati, Ohio and FutureLogic was not present when Coca-Cola installed the<br />

units in the field for use by customers of its vending machines.<br />

51. The VM printers were still in use as of February 15, 2001 and the field<br />

test was successful.<br />

52. Out of the 24 VM printers provided to Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola returned<br />

only two or three printers to Futurelogic for repair or replacement.<br />

53. During the prosecution of the '855 patent, FutureLogic, the inventor<br />

and his patent attorney intentionally failed to disclose to the PTO the April 25 and<br />

October 18, 1999 offers for sale, the sale of 24 prototype units to Coca-Cola or the<br />

public use activity in Cincinnati, Ohio.<br />

54. During the prosecution of the '855 patent, FutureLogic, the inventor<br />

and its patent attorney knowingly made false statements to the Fro concerning the<br />

existence of a mutual non-disclosure agreement, the sharing of costs, the operation<br />

of the prototype units sold to Coca-Cola and the experimental use of such<br />

prototypes by Coca-Cola. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(2), in the alternative, if<br />

the "claimed invention" described in Mr. Meyerhofer's declarations and in remarks<br />

to the PTO by its patent attorney, is represented or determined to not include all<br />

Proposed -7-<br />

Additions to<br />

Answer<br />

-A0355-<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!