17.06.2013 Views

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

Case<br />

l0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

2O<br />

2l<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

!:10-cv-O7678-JFW-DTB Document 65-1 Filed 10/07/11 Page 15 of 36 Page ID<br />

#: 1292<br />

Nanop_'s Alleged Uncontroverted Response in Opposition<br />

Facts<br />

40. In November 1999, The Coca-<br />

Cola Company sent a purchase order to<br />

FutureLogic for the phase 1 and 2 VM<br />

printer prototypes. Subsequently, in<br />

April 2000, Coca-Cola Enterprises sent a<br />

purchase order for the phase 2 prototypes<br />

because the latter Coca-Cola company<br />

was operating the units in the field trial.<br />

41. By March 10, 2000, FutureLogic<br />

had produced at least fifteen VM<br />

printers.<br />

42. After receipt of Coca-Cola' s<br />

purchase order, on or about April 14,<br />

2000, FutureLogic shipped the 24 VM<br />

Printers to Coca-Cola. Invoices for these<br />

units were issued by FutureLogic on<br />

April 17, 18 and 20, 2000, respectively,<br />

to Coca-Cola.<br />

43. FutureLogic was not privy to the<br />

locations or the models of the vending<br />

machines in which Coca-Cola installed<br />

the printers for use in the field.<br />

-A0401-<br />

- 15 -<br />

Rotmds Decl. 22, Meyerhofer Tr,<br />

137:19-143:5; Rounds Decl. 14,<br />

Exhibit 15 (reference to Coca-Cola<br />

Enterprises).<br />

Disputed. The cited evidence does not<br />

establish that a November 1999<br />

purchase order for "VM" units was<br />

issued. The cited evidence does not<br />

establish that an April 2000 purchase<br />

order for "phase 2 prototypes" was<br />

issued.<br />

Rotmds Decl. 22, Meyerhofer Tr.<br />

44:7-46:21; Rounds Decl. 6, Exhibit 5<br />

at p. 1104.<br />

Undisputed.<br />

Rounds Decl. 22, Meyerhofer Tr.<br />

139:19-140:6, 143:7-17; Rounds Decl.<br />

16, Exhibit 17;<br />

Rounds Decl. 17, Exhibit 18.<br />

Undisputed that FutureLogic provided<br />

24 VM units to Coca-Cola or CCE.<br />

Disputed as to invoices being sent on<br />

April 17, 18, and 20, 2000. The cited<br />

evidence does establish the subject<br />

matter of any invoices sent on that date.<br />

Rounds Decl. 22, Meyerhofer Tr.<br />

37:16-39:21.<br />

Disputed. Scott Shimmin of<br />

FutureLogic visited CCE and helped to<br />

install the prototype printers into Coca-<br />

Cola vending machines. See E.<br />

Meyerhofer Decl. 14; Ex. 23.<br />

FI.yFURELOG IC'S S'h'IvlT OF ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT IN<br />

OPP TO NANOPTIX'S MOTION<br />

2:i0-CV-076784FW-DTB

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!