17.06.2013 Views

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 2 10-cv-07678-JFW-DTB<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

Document66 Filed 10/07/11 Page2of3 Page ID#:1389<br />

a business perspective something that might - they might see value in. So we<br />

thought, well, rather than just go in and just discuss it in general terms, we might<br />

make an prototype, which we did internally, but we never got to the point of talking<br />

to them about it.<br />

E. Meyerhofer Deposition at 25:11-26:12:<br />

Q. Did you demonstrate the Tokheim unit to anybody?<br />

A. Not to my recollection, we didn't.<br />

Q. What about people within FutureLogic? Who saw the -- did anybody<br />

see the unit in operation?<br />

A. I believe perhaps the same individual I mentioned, Wan Hsing Ma,<br />

might have, who was working there at that time. I can't -- I don't believe he worked<br />

on the project, but he may have. I can't recall. I remember doing a lot of the work<br />

myself on it, but he may have seen it.<br />

Q. Did Mark see it?<br />

A. Definitely Mark as well.<br />

Q. Anybody else?<br />

A. [ just don't recall --it was pretty much an engineering project. I don't<br />

recall really doing much with it beyond the lab.<br />

Q. Did you approach anybody ontside of FutureLogic, Tokheim included,<br />

about this design of the Toldleim unit?<br />

A. To my recollection we were getting it prepared to do that. And<br />

Tokheim's whole business took an adverse change about that time, so new projects<br />

were not going to be of interest, and that's when we decided not to pursue it. That<br />

was -- that's my recollection of it, so I think the answer is no to that.<br />

E. Meyerhofer Deposition at 37:1-17:<br />

Q. -- First Set of Interrogatories. Let me direct your attention to page 3.<br />

You see the sentence where it says, "The invention of the '855 Patent was<br />

conceived by September 3, 1997, and was reduced to practice by January 21,<br />

-A0498-<br />

EXCERPTS OF DEP. OF E. MEYERIIOFER ISO<br />

- 2 - MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 2:10-CV-<br />

07678-JFW-DTB<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!