17.06.2013 Views

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

Joint Appendix One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cas, ._2:10-cv-07678-J FW -DTB<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

l0<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

1,7<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

Document 65 Filed10/07/11 Page6of26 PagelD<br />

#: 1257<br />

before the critical date, Nanoptix points to FutureLogic's statement in all<br />

interrogatory response that the '855 Patent claims were reduced to practice by the<br />

construction of a printer on or before January 28, 1998, (Dkt. No. 55 at 4.) But this<br />

January 28, 1998 date of reduction to practice relates to a prototype gas pump<br />

printer FutureLogic created for a company called Tokheim, not the vending<br />

machine printer later built and provided to Coca-Cola. (FutureLogic's Statement<br />

Of Genuine Issues Of Material Fact ("Facts"), 49-55.) The gas pump printer was<br />

tested only in FutureLogic's private facilities and was never sold or even<br />

demonstrated for Tokheim. (ld. 52.) The printer that FutureLogic ultimately<br />

provided to Coca-Cola, prototype model nmnber PSA-66-VM, was not<br />

mmmfactured until March of 2000. The two printers that were the subject of<br />

alleged offers for sale to Coca-Cola in 1999--"KBCOK-66" and °'Custom<br />

CCUSA"_were never even built. (Facts, 76, 81 .)<br />

There is at least a genuine issue of material fact that requires denial of<br />

Nanoptix's motion for summary judganent because the evidence shows that the<br />

alleged sale, offers to sell, and field trials of FumreLogic's PSA-66-VM printers<br />

were experimental rather than commercial, which negates invalidity under<br />

Section 102(b). The evidence further shows that the alleged offers for sale in 1999<br />

related to hypothetical printers that were never built and therefore cannot be said to<br />

have embodied the '855 Patent. Nanoptix's motion for summary judgment of<br />

invalidity should be denied.<br />

II. STATEMENT OF FACTS<br />

A. By January 21_ 1998_ FutureLo_ic Had Built A Prototype Printer<br />

Intended For "l okheim That Embodied The '855 Patent<br />

On January 2 l, 1998, FutureLogic completed the firmware for a prototype<br />

gas pump printer wifll model number PMC-2010A. (Facts, 49.) The PMC-2010-<br />

A printer was designed to print vouchers and coupons using data received from two<br />

different sources--namely, a gas pump controller and a network promotional<br />

-A0366-<br />

OPPOSITION TO ])EFII_NDANT_S MOI'ION FOR<br />

2 SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br />

CV 10-07678-JFW (DTBX)<br />

I<br />

i<br />

!<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i<br />

!<br />

i<br />

l<br />

I<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!