Joint Appendix One

Case2:10-cv-07678-JFW-DTB Document14 Filed12/27/10 Page2of8 PagelD#:71
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
• Defendant Nanoptix, Inc. ("Nanoptix") hereby submits its Answer,
including affirmative defenses, and counterclaims as to the Complaint for Patent
Infringement of PlaintiffFutureLogic, Inc. ("FutureLogic")as follows:
THE PARTIES ............
I. Nanoptix lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
regarding the truth of the allegations in paragraph l and therefore denies the
allegations.
2. Nanoptix admits that it is a Canadian corporation with its primary
place of business at 699 Champlain St., Dieppe, New Brunswick, Canada.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. Nanoptix admits that FutureLogic purports to bring this action under
the patent laws of the United States and that this Court has subject matter
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). Nanoptix, however, denies
the merits of the claims asserted against it.
4. Nanoptix admits that it is subject to personal jurisdiction in this
district. Nanoptix denies the remaining allegations in paragraph 4.
5. Nanoptix admits that it is subject to personal jurisdiction in this
district. Nanoptix denies the remaining allegations in paragraph 5.
6. Nanoptix admits that venue is proper in this district, but denies having
committed any wrongful acts upon which venue allegedly is based.
PATENT-IN-SUIT
7. Nanoptix admits that U.S. Patent No. 7,594,855 (the '"855 patent"),
entitled "Method and Apparatus for Gaming Promotional Printer," was issued by
the United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 29, 2009 with Mark
Meyerhofer listed as the inventor. Nanoptix lacks knowledge or information
sufficient to form a belief regarding the truth of the remaining allegations in
paragraph 7 and therefore denies the allegations.
8. Nanoptix lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
- I " AN_WI:ROJ:NANOPIlX, IN("
-A0087- •
I
I
!
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I