Joint Appendix One

Case :.):10-cv-07678-J FW -DTB
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document 21 Filed 01/21/11 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:94
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant FutureLogic, Inc. ('TutureLogic")
replies as follows to the Counterclaims by Defendant and Counterclaimant
Nanoptix, Inc. ("Nanopfix") set forth in Nanoptix's Answer, Affirmative Defenses,
and Counterclaims ("Answer") filed December 27, 2010.
The Parties
1. FutureLogic admits the allegations of paragraph 22.
2. FutureLogic admits the allegations of paragraph 23.
Jurisdiction and Venue
3. FutureLogic admits that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction as
described in paragraph 25, but denies that the allegations in Nanoptix's
counterclaims have any merit.
4. FutureLogic admits that this Court has personal jurisdiction over the
counterclaims, but denies that the allegations in Nanoptix's counterclaims have any
merit.
5. FutureLogic admits that venue is proper in this district.
FIRST COUNTERCLAIM
(Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement)
6. FutureLogic admits the allegations of paragraph 28.
7. In m_swer to paragraph 29, FutureLogic admits, denies, and alleges as
indicated in paragraphs 1-6.
8. FutureLogic admits that through its First Counterclaim, Nanoptix
requests declaratory relief that the claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,594,855 ("the '855
patent") are not infringed. FutureLogic denies, however, that the claims of the '855
patent are not infringed.
SECOND COUNTERCLAIM
(Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity)
9. FutureLogic admits the allegations of paragraph 31.
10. In answer to paragraph 32, FutureLogic a&nits, denies, and alleges as
-A0095-
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-07678-JFW-DTB
- 2 - FUTURELOGIC'S REPLY TO NANOPTIX'S
COUNTERCLAIMS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I