Joint Appendix One

Case __: 10-cv-O7678-JFW -DTB
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FutureLogic's Statement of Genuine
Issues Of Material Facts in Opposition
To Nanoptix's Motion For Summary
Judgment
131. Testing was also necessary to
determine whether the prototype printers
would fimction for their intended
purpose of printing coupons using
coupon data sent to tile printers from a
promotional controller and printing
vouchers based on data received from the
machine controller.
132. Testing was also necessary to
determine whether the printer would jam
if a customer tried to put his finger over
the bezel or insert an object into the
bezel.
133. Testing was required to determine
whether tile prototype printer was sturdy
enough to withstand customer abuse,
such as attempts to manipulate or
interfere with the printer.
134. Testing was fitrther necessary to
determine how and whether tile printer
would function in wet or rainy conditions
to which all outdoor vending machine
would be exposed.
135. The coupon pnnters provided by
FutureLogic to Coca-Cola in the 1998-
2000 timeframe were for experimental
purposes and never commercialized
Document 65-1 Filed 10/07/11 Page 32 of 36 Page ID
#: 1309
-32-
-A0418-
Supporting Evidence
E. Meyerhofer Decl. 10.
E. Meyerhofer Decl. l 0.
E. Meyerhofer Decl. 10.
E. Meyerhofer Decl. 10.
M. Meyerhofer Decl. 3; Oct. 6. 2011
Ahluwalia Decl. 4; Ulmld Decl. 7.
FLI'I'URELOG[C'S S] _,|'1" OF ISSUES OF MATF.RIAL FACT IN
OPP TO NA NOPTIX'S MOT[ON
2:10-CV-07678- Jt,%V-DTB
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
!
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I