Joint Appendix One

Case 2:10-cv-07678-JFW-DTB Document 57-12 Filed 09/28/11 Page 2 of 6 Page ID
#: 1049
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
For each claim of the PATENT-IN-SUIT, state the invention date, and
identify all evidence supporting conception of the invention, reduction to practice
of the invention, and diligence from the date of conception to the date of reduction
to practice of the invention, and identify each PERSON with knowledge of any of
the foregoing, along with all DOCUMENTS relating to the foregoing.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
FutureLogic objects to this interrogatory on the grounds set forth in its
Preliminary Statement and General Objections above, all of which are specifically
incorporated herein by this reference.
Subject to and without waiving any general or specific objections set forth
above, and to the extent FutureLogic understands this request, FutureLogic
responds to this interrogatory as follows:
The claims of the '855 Patent were reduced to practice before December 19,
2000. FutureLogic constructed a number of prototype promotional printers having
the features of the invention for experimental use, including a co-development
project FutureLogie conducted with a soft drink manufacturer under a mutual non-
disclosure agreement. The prototypes were operated for a period of time by
FutureLogic and the soft drink manufacturer before December 19, 2000. The
purpose of this operational period was to test the operation of the prototype
promotional printers in vending machines. The evidence supporting the reduction
to practice before December 19, 2000 is included in the file history of the '855
Patent, Mark Meyerhofer has knowledge of the conception and reduction to
practice of the invention of the '855 Patent. In addition, Eric Meyerhofer and Oleg
V. Dymovsky have knowledge of the development and operation of the prototype
promotional printers.
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
FutureLogic objects to this interrogatory on the grounds set tbrth in its
00130
Nanoptix' Summary Judgment Exhibit No. 10
-A0269-
FUTURELOGIC'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
2 RESPONSES TO NANOPTIX'S FIRST SET OF
I NTERROGATORIES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I