30.06.2013 Views

View/Open

View/Open

View/Open

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

difference and turnover intent in the group in which supervisors are 41 years old and<br />

more. This correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).<br />

Table 32: Supervisor Tenure<br />

Fewer than 10.4 years:<br />

LMX Difference 1<br />

LMX<br />

Difference AOC TI<br />

AOC -.429 ** 1<br />

TI .127 -.262 ** 1<br />

10.4 years and more:<br />

LMX Difference 1<br />

AOC -.274 ** 1<br />

TI .211 * -.609 ** 1<br />

Note: ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)<br />

* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)<br />

Below 10.4 years: n = 213, 10.4 years and above: n = 102<br />

The bivariate correlation analysis results of the sub-groups in which supervisors’<br />

organisational tenure are fewer than 10.4 years is compared with those where<br />

supervisors’ organisational tenure was 10.4 years and more. Data on Table 32 indicates<br />

that, among the sub-groups there is a significant reduction in the significance of LMX<br />

difference with subordinates’ organisational commitment. While it is moderately<br />

correlated (.429) in the sub-group where supervisors’ organisational tenure is fewer<br />

than 10.4 years, there is only a small correlation (.274) between these variables in the<br />

sub-group where supervisors’ organisational tenure is 10.4 years and more. The<br />

correlations in both the sub-groups are significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). The<br />

results further displayed that there is no significant difference in the correlation value<br />

between LMX difference and subordinates’ turnover intent among these sub-groups.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!