View/Open
View/Open
View/Open
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
difference and turnover intent in the group in which supervisors are 41 years old and<br />
more. This correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).<br />
Table 32: Supervisor Tenure<br />
Fewer than 10.4 years:<br />
LMX Difference 1<br />
LMX<br />
Difference AOC TI<br />
AOC -.429 ** 1<br />
TI .127 -.262 ** 1<br />
10.4 years and more:<br />
LMX Difference 1<br />
AOC -.274 ** 1<br />
TI .211 * -.609 ** 1<br />
Note: ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)<br />
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)<br />
Below 10.4 years: n = 213, 10.4 years and above: n = 102<br />
The bivariate correlation analysis results of the sub-groups in which supervisors’<br />
organisational tenure are fewer than 10.4 years is compared with those where<br />
supervisors’ organisational tenure was 10.4 years and more. Data on Table 32 indicates<br />
that, among the sub-groups there is a significant reduction in the significance of LMX<br />
difference with subordinates’ organisational commitment. While it is moderately<br />
correlated (.429) in the sub-group where supervisors’ organisational tenure is fewer<br />
than 10.4 years, there is only a small correlation (.274) between these variables in the<br />
sub-group where supervisors’ organisational tenure is 10.4 years and more. The<br />
correlations in both the sub-groups are significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). The<br />
results further displayed that there is no significant difference in the correlation value<br />
between LMX difference and subordinates’ turnover intent among these sub-groups.<br />
89