- Page 1 and 2: An examination of the relationship
- Page 3 and 4: 3.2 Research Paradigms ............
- Page 5: LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Measures of
- Page 9 and 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I take this opport
- Page 11 and 12: employees and help human resource d
- Page 13 and 14: Several leadership theories can be
- Page 15 and 16: 1.2 Research Objective This study d
- Page 17 and 18: 1.5 Definitions of Key Terms Leader
- Page 19 and 20: 2.2 Characteristics of the Hospital
- Page 21 and 22: satisfaction, as employees have a v
- Page 23 and 24: The theories that focus on follower
- Page 25 and 26: Colquitt, Lepine and Wesson (2011)
- Page 27 and 28: elationships with the organisation.
- Page 29 and 30: In particular, Grestner and Day (19
- Page 31 and 32: Martin, 2004; Kenney, Blascovich, &
- Page 33 and 34: 2.5.1.5 Egocentric bias Egocentric
- Page 35 and 36: The foregoing sections reviewed the
- Page 37 and 38: (1993)analysed the relationship bet
- Page 39 and 40: etter organisational commitment whe
- Page 41 and 42: Turnover is a topic of intense rese
- Page 43 and 44: poor working conditions and unsatis
- Page 45 and 46: group, they will regard themselves
- Page 47 and 48: 3.1 Introduction CHAPTER 3 - METHOD
- Page 49 and 50: present study is consistent with a
- Page 51 and 52: hospitality literature have been co
- Page 53 and 54: Table 1: Measures of Subordinate LM
- Page 55 and 56: Table 3: Measures of Turnover Inten
- Page 57 and 58:
English (Manjunath & Kurian, 2009).
- Page 59 and 60:
and a Participant Information Sheet
- Page 61 and 62:
3.8.1.2 Support for the Difference
- Page 63 and 64:
dependent or independent (Székely
- Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER 4 - RESULTS The research in
- Page 67 and 68:
1. Gender: Lodging: All of the 161
- Page 69 and 70:
are marginally more experienced wit
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 9: Industry Experience of Sub
- Page 73 and 74:
Table 10: Job Function of Subordina
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 11: Hospitality Education of
- Page 77 and 78:
4.1.2 Supervisors The supervisors w
- Page 79 and 80:
3. Tenure: All supervisors from bot
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 16: Industrial Experience of
- Page 83 and 84:
experience among the supervisors in
- Page 85 and 86:
among these supervisors ranged from
- Page 87 and 88:
This hypothetical supervisor will h
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 2: Scree Plot 78
- Page 91 and 92:
supervisor LMX score of each partic
- Page 93 and 94:
On the other hand, supervisor LMX i
- Page 95 and 96:
Table 26: Correlation Results when
- Page 97 and 98:
Table 29: Subordinate Tenure Fewer
- Page 99 and 100:
a moderate correlation (.322) betwe
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 33: Supervisor Industry Exper
- Page 103 and 104:
From the results presented in Table
- Page 105 and 106:
5.1 Introduction CHAPTER 5 - DISCUS
- Page 107 and 108:
findings suggest that behaviours re
- Page 109 and 110:
agreement with the organisational c
- Page 111 and 112:
In addition, the research used two
- Page 113 and 114:
commitment. It is evident that comm
- Page 115 and 116:
science study, where perceptions of
- Page 117 and 118:
REFERENCES Adler-Milstein, J., Sing
- Page 119 and 120:
BLS. (2011). Job openings and labor
- Page 121 and 122:
De Matos, C. A., Henrique, J. L., &
- Page 123 and 124:
Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1
- Page 125 and 126:
Kara, D. (2012). Organisational com
- Page 127 and 128:
Lord, R. G., & Emrich, C. G. (2001)
- Page 129 and 130:
Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A.,
- Page 131 and 132:
Sin, H. P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morg
- Page 133 and 134:
Vecchio, R. P. (1998). Leader-membe
- Page 135 and 136:
Kindly complete the following quest
- Page 137 and 138:
Appendix 2: Supervisor Questionnair
- Page 139 and 140:
Appendix 3: Participant Information
- Page 141 and 142:
The only cost to you is your time:
- Page 143 and 144:
Appendix 5: Participant Information
- Page 145 and 146:
How do I agree to participate in th