30.06.2013 Views

View/Open

View/Open

View/Open

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.4 Leader Member Exchange (LMX) Theory<br />

2.4.1 LMX Defined<br />

Developed by Graen (1975) and colleagues (e.g. Dansereau et al., 1975), Leader-<br />

Member Exchange theory, initially called Vertical Dyad theory, focuses on the<br />

valuable leadership achieved in the relationship between the leaders and the followers<br />

(Martin et al., 2010). The focal notion of LMX is that leadership occurs through an<br />

effective relationship development of individuals (Uhl-Bien, 2006). These<br />

relationships progress through a sequence of social exchanges and are defined as the<br />

value of the relationship between the leader and the subordinate (Schriesheim, Castro,<br />

& Cogliser, 1999). LMX theory states that, within work units, the quality of the leader-<br />

member exchange differs widely along a continuum of low to high quality LMX.<br />

Members in the low quality LMX range receive fewer valued resources than those in<br />

high quality LMX relationships. Graen and Cashman(1975) argue that a contractual<br />

atmosphere is maintained in the exchanges at this level. In contrast, leadership<br />

relationships with high quality LMX are those most favoured by their leader, and the<br />

exchanges often surpass the limitation of a formal employment contract. These<br />

subordinates thus receive influence and support from their managers, thereby<br />

providing the subordinates greater autonomy and responsibility (Dansereau et al.,<br />

1975). This in turn, enhances the subordinates’ work performance (Hogg & Martin,<br />

2003). Sin et al. (2003) state that high level leader member exchange (i.e. LMX) is<br />

characterized by a high degree of trust and obligation, whereas low level LMX implies<br />

a low level of trust. These groups of high quality and low quality LMX relationships<br />

are sometimes mentioned as “in-group” and “out-group” (Graen & Cashman, 1975) or<br />

as “trusted assistants” and “hired hands” (Cogliser et al., 2009).<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!