View/Open

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 6: Supervisor Consent Form Consent Form Project title: An examination of the relationship between Leader-Member-Exchange (LMX) Agreement and the work attitudes of the hotel employees Project Supervisor: Dr Peter Kim Researcher: Amrit C Sankaran I have read and understood the information provided about this research project in the Information Sheet dated 13 th September, 2011. I am 20 years or older. I have had an opportunity to ask questions and to have them answered. I understand that I may withdraw myself, or any other information that I have provided for this project at any time prior to completion of data collection, without being disadvantaged in any way. If I withdraw, I understand that all relevant information will be destroyed. I understand that the information collected will be used for academic purposes only and will not be published in any form outside of this project without my written permission. I give consent to the researcher for contacting my supervisor and I understand that my responses to the survey will not be disclosed to the supervisor. I agree to take part in this research. Supervisor’s signature:…………………………………………………... Supervisor’s name:……………………………………………………………………… Date: Approved by the Auckland University of Technology Ethics Committee on 8 December 2011 AUTEC Reference number: 11/256 Note: The Participant should retain a copy of this form. 135
Page 1 and 2:
An examination of the relationship
Page 3 and 4:
3.2 Research Paradigms ............
Page 5 and 6:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Measures of
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Conceptua
Page 9 and 10:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I take this opport
Page 11 and 12:
employees and help human resource d
Page 13 and 14:
Several leadership theories can be
Page 15 and 16:
1.2 Research Objective This study d
Page 17 and 18:
1.5 Definitions of Key Terms Leader
Page 19 and 20:
2.2 Characteristics of the Hospital
Page 21 and 22:
satisfaction, as employees have a v
Page 23 and 24:
The theories that focus on follower
Page 25 and 26:
Colquitt, Lepine and Wesson (2011)
Page 27 and 28:
elationships with the organisation.
Page 29 and 30:
In particular, Grestner and Day (19
Page 31 and 32:
Martin, 2004; Kenney, Blascovich, &
Page 33 and 34:
2.5.1.5 Egocentric bias Egocentric
Page 35 and 36:
The foregoing sections reviewed the
Page 37 and 38:
(1993)analysed the relationship bet
Page 39 and 40:
etter organisational commitment whe
Page 41 and 42:
Turnover is a topic of intense rese
Page 43 and 44:
poor working conditions and unsatis
Page 45 and 46:
group, they will regard themselves
Page 47 and 48:
3.1 Introduction CHAPTER 3 - METHOD
Page 49 and 50:
present study is consistent with a
Page 51 and 52:
hospitality literature have been co
Page 53 and 54:
Table 1: Measures of Subordinate LM
Page 55 and 56:
Table 3: Measures of Turnover Inten
Page 57 and 58:
English (Manjunath & Kurian, 2009).
Page 59 and 60:
and a Participant Information Sheet
Page 61 and 62:
3.8.1.2 Support for the Difference
Page 63 and 64:
dependent or independent (Székely
Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER 4 - RESULTS The research in
Page 67 and 68:
1. Gender: Lodging: All of the 161
Page 69 and 70:
are marginally more experienced wit
Page 71 and 72:
Table 9: Industry Experience of Sub
Page 73 and 74:
Table 10: Job Function of Subordina
Page 75 and 76:
Table 11: Hospitality Education of
Page 77 and 78:
4.1.2 Supervisors The supervisors w
Page 79 and 80:
3. Tenure: All supervisors from bot
Page 81 and 82:
Table 16: Industrial Experience of
Page 83 and 84:
experience among the supervisors in
Page 85 and 86:
among these supervisors ranged from
Page 87 and 88:
This hypothetical supervisor will h
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 2: Scree Plot 78
Page 91 and 92:
supervisor LMX score of each partic
Page 93 and 94:
On the other hand, supervisor LMX i
Page 95 and 96: Table 26: Correlation Results when
Page 97 and 98: Table 29: Subordinate Tenure Fewer
Page 99 and 100: a moderate correlation (.322) betwe
Page 101 and 102: Table 33: Supervisor Industry Exper
Page 103 and 104: From the results presented in Table
Page 105 and 106: 5.1 Introduction CHAPTER 5 - DISCUS
Page 107 and 108: findings suggest that behaviours re
Page 109 and 110: agreement with the organisational c
Page 111 and 112: In addition, the research used two
Page 113 and 114: commitment. It is evident that comm
Page 115 and 116: science study, where perceptions of
Page 117 and 118: REFERENCES Adler-Milstein, J., Sing
Page 119 and 120: BLS. (2011). Job openings and labor
Page 121 and 122: De Matos, C. A., Henrique, J. L., &
Page 123 and 124: Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1
Page 125 and 126: Kara, D. (2012). Organisational com
Page 127 and 128: Lord, R. G., & Emrich, C. G. (2001)
Page 129 and 130: Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A.,
Page 131 and 132: Sin, H. P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morg
Page 133 and 134: Vecchio, R. P. (1998). Leader-membe
Page 135 and 136: Kindly complete the following quest
Page 137 and 138: Appendix 2: Supervisor Questionnair
Page 139 and 140: Appendix 3: Participant Information
Page 141 and 142: The only cost to you is your time:
Page 143 and 144: Appendix 5: Participant Information
Page 145: How do I agree to participate in th
show all

View/Open

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?