View/Open
View/Open
View/Open
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 35: Correlation Results of Lodging and Dining groups<br />
Lodging:<br />
LMX Difference 1<br />
LMX<br />
Difference AOC TI<br />
AOC -.438 ** 1<br />
TI .177 -.255 ** 1<br />
Dining:<br />
LMX Difference 1<br />
AOC -.315 ** 1<br />
TI .048 -.415 ** 1<br />
Note: ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)<br />
Lodging: n = 161, dining: n = 154<br />
The bivariate correlation analysis results of the lodging sector were compared with that<br />
of the dining sector. The results presented in Table 35 indicate that LMX difference is<br />
correlated to subordinate’s organisational commitment and turnover intent, and there<br />
are no significant differences in the results with the overall results furnished in Table<br />
25. Further the direction of correlation is also similar to the overall correlation results<br />
displayed in Table 25. This implies that, the differences in the hospitality sectors do<br />
not have any influence on the relationship of LMX agreement with subordinates’<br />
organisational commitment and turnover intent.<br />
In the next chapter, the summary of these findings along with the theoretical and<br />
practical implications of the study will be discussed. Further in the next chapter, the<br />
limitations of this research will be identified and the areas for future research will be<br />
suggested.<br />
93