View/Open
View/Open
View/Open
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
From the results presented in Table 28 through to Table 34, it is evident that<br />
subordinates’ organisational commitment is moderately correlated to the LMX<br />
difference among all the sub-groups. The LMX difference variable is highly correlated<br />
with organisation commitment when the supervisors have lesser tenure with the<br />
organisation (-.429) and in sub-groups were the supervisors have vast industry<br />
experience (-.475). Furthermore, the direction of correlation remains unchanged and is<br />
similar to the overall correlation results established in Table 25. As a result there are<br />
no statistically significant differences in the correlation between LMX agreement and<br />
subordinates’ organisation commitment among the sub-groups.<br />
It is further observed that, when bivariate correlation is performed individually among<br />
the sub-groups, the correlation significance level of subordinates’ turnover intent with<br />
the LMX difference variable is drastically reduced. The analyses show that the<br />
correlation among the LMX difference variable and the turnover intent variable is<br />
comparatively high in the sub-groups of older managers (.254) and those managers<br />
who have less position experience (.211). Nevertheless, though level of correlation<br />
between the LMX difference and the turnover intent was low, it was predominantly<br />
similar to the overall correlation level of LMX difference and turnover intent. As a<br />
result there are only marginal statistical significant differences in the correlation<br />
between LMX agreement and subordinates’ turnover intent among the sub-groups.<br />
Finally, bivariate correlation analyses were conducted individually with the responses<br />
from the lodging group and the dining group. Table 35 indicate the bivariate<br />
correlation among the lodging group and the dining group respectively.<br />
92