07.07.2013 Views

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2005 City Focus Group<br />

Request to the Focus Group<br />

Thank you for assisting me with the slopes issue in our community. I appreciated the<br />

direct and nonconfrontational dialogue from each of you during our discussions on this<br />

matter. Your different perspectives and backgrounds should significantly contribute to<br />

this process. As we discussed on Tuesday, I am looking for you to send me clear bullets<br />

on what you feel should be the purpose and intent of slope preservation, if any. If you<br />

feel they should not be protected, I also would expect clear statements as to why they<br />

should not be protected. After I have received comments from the entire group, I will<br />

assemble for all to review. Please have your comments back to me by this Thursday<br />

(8/25/05) so that I can keep this process moving.<br />

As I mentioned on Tuesday, we will assemble every policy and code language that<br />

addresses each of your issues related to slope preservation. Once this information is put<br />

together, I will distribute and call our second meeting.<br />

Again, thanks for your participation.<br />

Wayne<br />

Tom Asbury<br />

All development creates problems whether you are developing on a flat piece of dirt or a<br />

slope. We have put in place a very restrictive set of ordinances to deal with the problems<br />

associated with developing land. Let's use it for that purpose.<br />

I see no good reason for restricting sloped areas other than to create more green space in<br />

a development. Our comp plan designates we should develop to a higher density within<br />

the urban core in order to take advantage of the very expensive infrastructure.<br />

If we want to set aside an area within a development that will remain green (water<br />

feature, landscaped, etc.) then let's decide what percent it should be, live with it, and<br />

build on the balance of the property.<br />

Nancy Miller<br />

I want to second Laurie's comment that these areas that are off limits to development<br />

should not be taxed at the rate applied to other property. For a long time I've wondered<br />

why a different taxing structure didn't exist for wetlands, severe grades, unique forest<br />

stands (native and hi quality successional) and to some extent floodplain. If the<br />

community wants these areas protected, the land owner should get some benefit for<br />

having that unique resource on his property.<br />

I just thought of something I left out - soil types and rainfall amounts and intensity. The<br />

soil types - Orangeburg, Dothan and Norfolk - are very erodable and are concentrated in<br />

Page 377 of 622 Posted at 5:00 p.m. on April 1, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!