07.07.2013 Views

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Laurie Dozier<br />

Given that I am not an engineer, a land planner, a geologist, a biologist, etc. the<br />

comments below are mainly observations based on what I've heard or read and personal<br />

opmwns.<br />

What I've heard or read:<br />

-There are 450,000 acres in the City (or was it the County?)<br />

-There are only 1,800 acres of severe slopes<br />

-There are only 17,000 acres of significant slopes (of which 50% are currently allowed to<br />

be developed)<br />

-Development of over 50% of significant slopes is allowed for urban infill and to create<br />

new high wage jobs<br />

-Off-site mitigation is allowed<br />

-Everything in Zoe's comments<br />

My Thoughts<br />

-If we are currently allowed to develop 50% of significant slopes on any site, are allowed<br />

to develop property with significant slopes if we have off-site mitigation and are allowed<br />

to develop more than 50% of significant slopes for urban in-fill or high paying jobs then<br />

the limitation on developing significant slopes seems to me to be based on feel-good<br />

notions rather than science.<br />

-Zoe, while I understand and appreciate all that you have written, it seems to me that your<br />

comments apply to all property. Clearly, any development, regardless of topography, is a<br />

great step-down for the environment. It seems that the unique features of greater slopes<br />

is the soil type and the velocity - the more clay in the soil + the greater velocity of run-off<br />

= increased erosion. Since we are talking about developing property, not clearing it<br />

alone, the difference in steeper slopes seems to be controlling the run-off during<br />

construction. While I know first hand how improbable it is to design temporary controls<br />

for our 6" storm events, I would guess, given the limited number of acres in play, that the<br />

blowouts on properties with steep slopes, however great, would be significantly less than<br />

the combined flatter properties being developed.<br />

-I would hope that property which currently can not be developed is not being taxed at<br />

the level of developable land, if it is, then I believe we owe those tax payers a refund.<br />

So, what do I think?<br />

Given:<br />

-That significant slopes can already be developed<br />

-That there is a very small amount of land designated as severely sloped<br />

-That we expect development to continue in our community<br />

-That we are talking only about land in the City limits<br />

Page 586 of 622 Posted at 5:00 p.m. on April 1, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!