nmm sP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$WI LD R LATI\IES CROP PLANTS IN INDIA$

$~\\~SAnfF~~~ ,$

114 THE BKITISH SMUT KTTNGI DE BABY, A. (1874). Protomyces microsporus und seine Verwandten.—Bot. Ztg, xxxii, pp. 82-92, 98-107. BAUCH, R. (1922). tJber Kopulationsbedingungemind sekundare GescWeehtsmerkmale bei JJstilago violacea.—Biol. Zbl., xlii, pp. 9-38. , (1923). tJber Vstilago longissima und ihre Varietat macrospora.—Z, Bot., xv, pp. 241-80. . (1925). Xlntersuehungen uber die Entwicklungsgesehicht©'und Sexualphysiologie der Vstilago bromivora und U. grandis.—Z. Bot., xvii, pp. 129-77. —•— (1927). Rassenunterschiede und sekundare GesoMechtsmerkmale beim Antherenbrand.—Biol. Zbl, xlvii, pp. 370-83. —•— (1930). Multipolare Sexualitat bei Ustilago longissima.—Arch. Protistenk., Ixx, pp. 417-66. (1931). Geographische Verteilung und funktionelle Differenzierung der Faktoren bei der multipolaren Sexualitat von Vstilago longissima.—Arch. Protistenk., Ixxv, pp. 101-32. (1932 a). The sexuality of Vstilago scorzonerae and Vstilago zeae.—Phytopath. Z., v, pp. 315-21. •—— (1932 b). tJber die genetischen Grundlagen von Zwittrigkeit und neutralem Verhalten bei Brandpilzen.—Planta, xvii, pp. 612—40. •(1932 c). Sphacelotheca schweinfurthiana, ein neuer multipolarer Brandpilz.—Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges., 1, pp. 17-21. BECKEE, T. (1936). TJntersuohungen fiber Sexualitat bei Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) Wint. im Rahmen der Immunitatszuohtung.—Phytopath. Z.i ix, pp. 187-228. BBBB, R. (1920). On a new species of Melanotaenium with a general account of the genus.— Trans. Brit, mycol. iSoc, vi, pp. 331-43. BEKKELBY, M. J. (1847). Observations on the propagation of bunt (Vredo caries DC), made with special reference to the potato disease.—J. hort. Soc., ii, pp. 107-14. BEVBK, W. M. (1939). Reinooulation of resistant varieties of wheat with purified physiologic races of Tilletia tritici and T. levis.—Phytopathology, xxix, pp. 863-71. (1942). A non-pathogenic buff-coloured barley smut.—Phytopathology, xxxii, pp. 637-9. (1945). Hybridization and genetics in Vstilago hordei and V. nigra.—J. agric. Res., Ixxi, pp. 41-59. (1947). Physiologic races of Vstilago tritici in the eastern soft wheat region of the United States.—Phytopathology, xxxvii, pp. 889-95. BMZZABD, A. W. (1926). The nuclear phenomena and life-history of Vrocystis cepulae.—• Bull. Torrey bot. CI., liii, pp. 77-117. BLODGETT, E. C. (1944). The dwarf bunt diseases of wheat in Idaho in 1943.—Plant Dis. Reptr, xxviii, pp. 785-9. BLUMEB, S. (1937). Untersuohungen iiber die Biologie von Vstilago violacea (P^rs.) Fuck. I. Mitteilung: Emahrungs- und Kulturbedingungen. Wirkungen des Saponins.—Arch. Mikrobiol., viii, pp. 458-78. BoDiNE, E. W., & DuBEBLL, L. W. (1930). Inoculation of wheat with Tilletia levis (Kiihn).— Phytopathology, xx, pp. 663-8. BOND, T. E. T. (1940). Observations on the disease of Sea-Lyme-grass (Elymus arenarius L.) caused by Vstilago hypodytes (Schlecht.) Fries.—Ann. appl. Biol., xxvii, pp. 330-7. BoENHovD, LisELOTTB (1936). Beitrage zur Biologic von Vstilago hypodites (Schldl.) Fr. auf Elymus arenarius L.—Phytopath. Z., ix, pp. 69-97. Boss, G. (1927). Beitrage zur Zytologie der Ustilagineen.—Planta, iii, pp. 697-627. BOWMAN, D. H. (1946). Sporidial fusion in Vstilago maydis.—-J. agric. iJes.,Ixxii,pp. 233-43. BBEFBLD, O. (1883). Vntersuchungen aus dem Gesammtgebiet der Mykologie, v. • (1888). Neue Untersuohungen Tiber die Brandpilze und die Brandkrankheiten. II.—• Nachr. Kl. Landw., Bert, pp. 220-2; 1577-84; 1588-94; 1597-1602. (1895). Vntersuchungen atis dem Gesammtgebiet der Mykologie, ,xi and xii. (1903). Neue Untersuchxmgen und Ergebnisse iiber die natiirliehe Infektion und Verbreitung der Brandkrankheiten des Getreides.—Nachr. Kl. Landw., Berl., No. 466, pp. 4224-34. • (1912). Vntersuchungen aus dem Gesammtgebiete der Mykologie., xv. BEESSMAN, E. N. (1931). Rye infected with bunt of wheat.—Phytopathology, xxi, pp. 437-40. (1932 a). Lolium infected with bunt of wheat.—Phytopathology, xxii, pp. 865-6. (1932 b). Susceptibility and resistance of wheat varieties to bunt.—J. Amer. Soc. Agroti., xxiv, pp. 249-55. & HAEEIS, L. E. (1933). Inheritance in Albit wheat of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tretici.—J. agric. Res., xlvi, pp. 361-5.
REFEEENCES 115 BBETT, M. A. (1940). Fungal infection of Vlex minor (Preliminary account).—Trans. Brit. • mycol. Soc, xxiv, p. 267. (See also Proc. Linn. Soc, Land., clxi, pp. 142-3, 1949.) BKIOGS, F. N. (1926). Inheritance of resistance to btmt, Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) Winter, in •wheat.—J. agric. Res., xxxii, pp. 973-90. ^(1927). DehuUing barley seed with sulfuric acid to induce infection with covered smut.—Phytopathology, xvii, p. 747. (1929). Factors which modify the resistance of wheat to bunt, Tilletia tritici.—Hilgardia, iv, pp. 175-84. (1930 a). Breeding wheats resistant to bunt by the back-cross method.—J. Amer. Soc. Agron., xxii, pp. 239-44. (1930 b). Inheritance of resistance to bimt, Tilletia tritici, in White Odessa wheat.— J. agric. Bes., xl, pp. 353-9. (1930 e). Inheritance of the second factor for resistance to bimt, Tilletia tritici, in Hussar wheat.—J. agric. Bes., xl, pp. 225-32. (1931). Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici, in hybrids of White Federation and Banner Berkeley wheats.—J. agric. Bes., xlii, pp. 307-13. (1932 a). Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici, in crosses of White Federation with Turkey wheats.—J. agric. Res., xliv, pp. 131-6. (1932 b). Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici, in hybrids of White Federation and Odessa wheat.—J. agric. Res., xlv, pp. 501-5. (1933). A third genetic factor for resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici in wheat hybrids.— J. Genet., xxvii, pp. 435-41. (1934). Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici, in Sherman and Oro wheat hybrids.—Genetics, xix, pp. 73-82. (1935 a). Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici, in hybrids of Turkey wheats. C.I. 1558B and C.I. 2578.—Hilgardia, x, pp. 19-25. (1935 b). The back-cross method in plant breeding.—J. Amer. Soc. Agron., xxvii, pp. 971-3. (1940). Linkage between the Martin and Turkey factors for resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici, in wheat.—J. Amer. Soc. Agron., xxxii, pp. 539-41. BEYAST, W. E. (1937). Breeding for smut resistance in Arizona-grown wheat.—Tech. Bull. Ariz, agric. Exp. Sta., 66, pp. 95-124. BuiiLEB, A. H. R. (1933). Researches on Fungi V. Hyphal fusions and protoplasmic streaming in higher fungi together with an account of the production and liberation of spores in Sporobolomyces, Tilletia and Sphaerobolus. 416 pp. & VANTEBPOOL, T. C. (1925). Violent spore discharge in Tilletia tritici.—Nature, Lond., cxvi, pp. 934^5. BuTLEE, E, J. (1929). The delimitation of species of fiuigi on physiological grounds.—Proc. int. Congr. Plant Sci., ii, pp. 1590-7. BuTTEESs, F. A., & DENNIS, R. W. G. (1947). The early history of cereal seed treatment in England.—Agric. Hist., xxi, pp. 93-103. CHEBEWICK, W. J. (1944). An improved method of determining the smut spore load on cereal seed.—Canad. J. Res., Sect. C, xxii, pp. 120-6. CHILTOIT, ST. J. P. (1938). Occiu-rence of lysis in certain crosses of Ustilago zeae.—Phytopathology, xxviii, p. 5. (1940). Delayed reduction of the diploid imcleus in promycelia of Ustilago zeae.— Phytopathology, xxx, pp. 622-3. (1943). A heritable abnormality in the germination of chlamydospores of Ustilago zeae.—Phytopathology, xxxiii, pp. 749-65. CHEISTENSBN, J. J. (1926). The relation of soil temperature and soil moisture to the development of head smut of sorghum.—Phytopathology, xvi, pp. 353-7. • (1931). Studies on the genetics of Ustilago zeae.—Phytopath. Z., iv, pp. 129-88. & JOHNSON, I. J. (1935). Field,reaction of varieties and selfed lines of corn to different collections of Ustilago zeae.—J. agric. Res., 1, pp. 47-57. & RoDENHiSEE, H. A. (1940). Physiologic specialization and genetics of the smut fungi.—Bot. Rev., vi, pp. 389-425. CHUECHWAED, J. G. (1931). Studies in the inheritance of resistance to bunt in a cross between Florence and Hard Federation Wheats.—J. roy. Soc. N.S.W., Ixiv, pp. 298- 319. —— (1932). Inheritance of resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.). Winter, and other characters in certain crosses of 'Florence' wheat.—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., Ivii, pp. 133-47. (1934). A note on the occurrence of seedling lesions caused by cereal smuts.—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., lix, pp. 197-9.
Page 1 and 2:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI ^ (USTILAGIN
Page 3:
FOREWORD THIS volume was started wh
Page 6 and 7:
6 PBEFACE We also acknowledge the b
Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTION THE smut fungi, which
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION H of bushels of wheat
Page 14 and 15:
FIG. 1. Vstilago avenae on Arrhenat
Page 16:
^^ THE BBITISH SMUT FUNGI Young hea
Page 19 and 20:
BIOLOGY 15 less than the normal, in
Page 21 and 22:
BIOLOGy 17 and united with it, fina
Page 23 and 24:
BIOLOGY 19 eermination in a collect
Page 25 and 26:
BIOLOGY 21 genus, and the manner of
Page 27 and 28:
BIOLOGY 23 species of Entyloma, and
Page 29 and 30:
3036^ BIOLOGY 25 in others. Dickins
Page 31 and 32:
CYTOLOGY THE discovery of nuclei in
Page 33 and 34:
GENETICS INCOMPATIBILITY KNIEP'S di
Page 35 and 36:
GENETICS • 31 direction of growth
Page 37 and 38:
GENETICS 35 when a few sporidia fro
Page 39 and 40:
GENETICS 37 lines retained their di
Page 41 and 42:
TECHNIQUE COLLECTION AND EXAMINATIO
Page 43 and 44:
TECHNIQUE 41 be undesirable. Weak a
Page 45 and 46:
TECHNIQUE 43 in one season (see p.
Page 47 and 48:
TECHNIQUE 45 barley with loose smut
Page 49 and 50:
TECHNIQUE 47 (1939), Holton & Heald
Page 51 and 52:
TECHNIQUE 49 Allen's, modification
Page 53 and 54:
CLASSIFICATION THE morphological ch
Page 55 and 56:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI MOST of the
Page 57 and 58:
FIG. 2. Spore geimination in Ustila
Page 59 and 60:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUJJGI 57 from one
Page 61 and 62:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUKGI 59 of exsert
Page 63 and 64:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 61 noticeabl
Page 65 and 66: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 63 Evidence
Page 67 and 68: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 65 winter in
Page 69 and 70: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 67 Ustilago
Page 71 and 72: THE BRITISH SMUT FUlJGI 69 material
Page 73 and 74: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 71 results o
Page 75 and 76: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 73 TTstilago
Page 77 and 78: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 75 Species i
Page 79 and 80: " TJSE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 77 Ustila
Page 81 and 82: THE BKITISH SMUT FUNGI 79 On Carex
Page 83 and 84: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 81 Exsiccati
Page 85 and 86: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 83 Tilletia
Page 87 and 88: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 85 bunt ball
Page 89 and 90: THE BEITISH SMUT FUNGI 87 globose t
Page 91 and 92: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 89 FIG. 13.
Page 93 and 94: FIG. 15. Spore geimination in Taboi
Page 95 and 96: FIG. 17. Spore germination in Urocy
Page 97 and 98: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 95 separate
Page 99 and 100: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 97 8ori in t
Page 101 and 102: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 99 Urocystis
Page 103 and 104: 30390 THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 101 pr
Page 105 and 106: FIG. 20. Spore geimination in Entyl
Page 107 and 108: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 105 Sori in
Page 109 and 110: On Ranunculus ficariae and B. scler
Page 111 and 112: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 109 Infectio
Page 113 and 114: THE BKITISH SMUT FUNGI 111 [Sporidi
Page 115: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 113 Ustilago
Page 119 and 120: REFERENCES 117 ^ DniON WESTON, W. A
Page 121 and 122: REFERENCES 119 GRIFFITHS, MAEIOK A.
Page 123 and 124: REFERENCES 121 HtjTTiG, W. (1933).
Page 125 and 126: REFEBENCES 123 LiMBOtruN, E. J. (19
Page 127 and 128: REFERENCES 125 NOBLE, E. J. (1934).
Page 129 and 130: REFERENCES 127 RoDENHiSEE, H. A., &
Page 131 and 132: BEFERENCES 129 STAKMAK, E. C, XCEEN
Page 133 and 134: EEFEEENCES 131 WAXTBE, J. M. (1934)
Page 135 and 136: INDEX to generic and specific names
Page 137 and 138: Muscari Ustilago vaillantii, 59 Myo
Page 139 and 140: Ustilago ficuum Reich., 113 —flps
Page 141 and 142: 2i}:y0 ANDHRA PRADESH AGRICULTURAL
show all

nmm sP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?