nmm sP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$WI LD R LATI\IES CROP PLANTS IN INDIA$

$~\\~SAnfF~~~ ,$

J16 THE BRITISH SMUT J'UNGI CHUBOHWABD, J. G. (1938 a). Studies on physiologic speciaKzation of the organisms causing bunt in wheat, and the genetics of resistance to this and certain other wheat diseases. I. Physiologic specialization studies.—J. roy. Soc. ^.S.W., Ixxi, pp. 362-84. (1938 b). Studies on physiologic speciaUzation of tlie organisms causing bunt in wheat, and the genetics of resistance to this and certain other wheat diseases. Part II. Genetieal studies.—J. roy. Soc. N.S.W., Ixxi, pp. 547-90. i _—. (1940). The initiation of infection by bunt of wheat (TilUtia caries).—Ann. appl. Biol., xxvii, pp. 58-64. , CiFBKEi, R. (1928). Quarta contribuzione alio studio degli Ustilaginales.—Ann. mycol., Berl., xxvi, pp. 1-68. —— (1932). The criteria for definition of species in mycology.—Ann. mycol., Berl., xxx, pp. 122-36. (1938). Ustilaginales.—Flora Italica Cryptogama, i, Fasc. 17, 443 pp. CLABK, J. A., QmsENBEBRY, K. S., & POWERS, L. E. R. (1933). Inheritance of bunt reaction and other characters in Hope wheat crosses.—/. agric. Res., xlvi, pp. 413-25. CUNTON, G. P. (1900). The smuts of IlUnois Agricultural plants.—Bull. III. agric. Exp. Sta. 57, pp. 289-360. —— (1904). North American UstUagineae.—Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist., xxxi, pp. 329-529. CoccoNi, G. (1889). Contribuzione alia Biologia dell' Vstilago omithogali (Schmidt et Kunze) Winter.—Mem. R. Accad. Bologna, iv, pp. 105-12. (1890). Sullo sviluppo della Thecaphora aterrima Tul., e dell' Urocystis primulicola Magnus. Rioherohe sperimentaU.—Mem. R. Accad. Bologna, iv, pp. 703-14. (1893). Contributo alia biologia del genere Ustilago Pers.—Mem. R. Accad. Bologna, v, pp. 527-37. (1898). Osservazioni e ricerche sopra una nuova forme di Schroeteria Winth.—R.C. Accad. Bologna, ii, pp. 210-21. CoTFMAN, F. A., STANTON, T. R., BAYLISS, B. B., WIKBB, G. A., SMITH, R. W., & TAPKE, V. F. (1931). Inheritance of resistance in oats to Vstilago levis.—J. agric. Res., xliii, pp. 1085-99. COOKE, M. C. (1878). Microscopic fungi. Ed. 4. London. (1906). Fungoid pests of cultivated plants. London. CoENU, M. (1883). Sur quelques Ustilaginees nouvelles ou peu connues.—Ann. Sci. not. Bot., Ser. 6, xv, pp. 269-96. COTTON, A. D. (1919). Onion smut: a disease new to Britain.—J. Minist. Agric., xxvi, pp. 168-74. CtTNNiNGHAM, G. H. (1924). The Ustilagiueae, or 'smuts', of New Zealand.—Trans. N.Z. Inst., Iv, pp. 397-433. DANGEABD, P. A. (1893). La reproduction sexueUe des TJstUaginees.—O.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, cxvii, pp. 496-7. • -(1894 3). La reproduction sexueUe de VEntylorna glaucii (Dang.).—Botaniste, iv, pp. 12-17. (1894 b). Recherches sur la reproduction sexuelle des champignons.—Botaniste, iii, pp. 240-81. DAVIE, R. C, & WILSON, M. (1914). Vstilago vaillantii Tul., on Chionodoxa luciliae Boiss.—• Notes R. bot. Qdn Edinb., viii, pp. 227-8. DAVIES, G. N. (1935). Some new aspects of maize smut.—Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci., ix, pp. 505-7. DAVIS, W. H. (1924). Spore germination of Vstilago striaeformis.—Phytopathology, xiv, pp. 251-67. (1926). Life history of Vstilago striaeformis (Westd.) Niessl which causes a leaf smut in Timothy.—J. agric. Res., xxxii, pp. 69-76. DICKINSON, S. (1926). A simple method of isolating and handling individual fungal spores and bacteria.—Ann. Bot., Land., xl, pp. 273-4. (1927). Experiments on the physiology and genetics of the smut' fungi. Hjrphalfusion.—Proc. roy. Soc, B., ci, pp. 126—36. • (1927-8). Experiments on the physiology and genetics of the smut fungi. Seedling infection.—Proc. roy. Soc, B., cii, pp. 174r-6. • (1928). Experiments on the physiology and genetics of the smut fungi. Cultural characters. Part I. Their permanence and segregation.—Proc. roy. Soc, B., ciii, pp. 547-55. (1931). Experiments on physiology and genetics ofthe smut fungi. Cultural characters. Part II. The effect of certain external conditions on their segregation.—Proc. roy. Soc, B., oviii, pp. 395-423. (1933). The technique of isolation in microbiology.—Phytopathology, xxiii, pp. 357-67.
REFERENCES 117 ^ DniON WESTON, W. A. R. (1929). The effect of Tilletia caries (D.C.) Tul. {T. tritici (Bjerk.) Wint.) on the development of the wheat ear.—Phytopathology, xix, pp. 681-5. • • (1932). The relative resistance of some wheat varieties to Tilletia caries (DC.) Tul. (= T. tritici (Bjerk.) Wint.). —Ann. appl. Biol., xix, pp. 35-54. (1939). Methods of seed disinfection.—^. Minist. Agfic, Land., xlvi, pp. 593-601. & BooEB, J. R. (1935). Seed disinfection, i. An outline of an investigation on disinfectant dusts containing mercury.—J. agric. Sci., xxv, pp. 628-49. & BBBTT, C. C. (1940). Seed disinfection.—Nature, Lofid., cxlv, p. 824. & TAYIOB, R, E. (1948). The plant in health and disease. 173 pp., London. DtJCOMBT, V. (1927). La earie du seigle.—iJei). Path. vSg. Erit. agric., xiv, pp. 193-4. EDDINS, A. H. (1929 a). Pathogenicity of multispoxidial and monosporidial cultures of Vstilago zeae (Beckm.) TJng.—Phytopathology, xix, p. 91. (1929 b). Pathogenicity and cultural behaviour of Ustilago zeae (Beckm.) Ung. from different localities.—Phytopathology, xix, pp. 885-916. ENOMOTO, S. (1934). On the rest period and its shortening in smut spores. (Prehminary report.)—Trans. Sapporo nat. Hist. Soc, xiii, pp. 167-72. EVAKS, R. I. (1933). Cytological.studies on the parasitic relationships of Urocystis cepulae to the onion.—Amer. J. Bot., xx, pp. 255-68. (1937). Cytological studies on the parasitic relationship of Urocystis cepulae to Allium fistulosum.—Amer. J. Bot., xxiv, pp. 214^-18. FABIS, J. A. (1924 a). Factors influencing infection of Hordeum sativum by Vstilago hordei.— Amer. J. Bot., xi, pp. 189-213. (1924b). Factors influencing the infection of wheat by Tilletia tritici and Tilletia . laevis.—-Mycologia, xvi, pp. 259-82. (1924 c). Physiological speciaUzation of Vstilago hordei.—Phytopathology, xiv, pp. 537-57. & REED, G. M. (1925). Modes of infection of sorghums by loose kernel smut.— Mycologia, xvii, pp. 50-67. FsLtx, E. L. (1939). Early planting, an aid in the control of onion smut.—Phytopathology/, xxix, p. 6. PBtroHT, W. (1930). Morphologische Abweichungen an Bromus erectus, verursacht durch Vstilago hypodytes.—Angew. Bot., xii, pp. 1-16. (1932). Die Wirkung des Steinbrandes, Tilletia tritici (Bjerkander) Winterund Tilletia foetens (Berkeley et Cmiis) Tulasne, auf verschiedene Winterweizensorten bei kimstlioher Infektion in ihrer Abhangigkeit von Susseren Faktoren.—Phytopath. Z., iv, pp. 247-90. FlOKB, C. H., & JOHNSTON, C. O. (1930). Cultural characteristics of physiologic forms of Sphacelotheca sorghi.—Phytopathology, xx, pp. 241-9. FiscH, C. (1884). Entwiokelungsgeschichte von Doassansia sagittariae.—Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges., ii, pp. 405-16. FISCHER, G. W. (1936 a). The longevity of smut spores in herbarium specimens.—Phytopathology, xxvi, pp. 1118-27. (1936 b). The susceptibility of certain wild grasses to Tilletia tritici and T. levis.— Phytopathology, xxvi, pp. 876-86. (1937). Observations on the comparative morphology and taxonomie relationships of certain grass smuts in western North America.—Mycologia, xxix, pp. 408-25. (1938). Some new grass smut records^ from the Pacific Northwest.—Mycologia, xxx, pp. 385-95. (1939 a). Studies of the susceptibility of forage grasses to cereal smut fungi. II. A preliminary report on Vstilago hordei and U. nigra.—Phytopathology, xxix, pp. 490-4. (1939b). Studies on the susceptibility of forage grasses to cereal smut fungi. III.Further data concerning Tilletia levis and T. tritici.—Phytopathology, xxix, pp. 575-91. (1940a). Fimdamental studies of the stripe smut of grasses (Vstilago striaeformis) in the Pacific Northwest.—Phytopathology, xxx, pp. 93-118. (1940 b). Host specialization in the head smut of grasses, Vstilago bullata.—Phytopathology, xxx, pp. 991-1017. (1940 c). Two eases of haplo-lethal deficiency in Vstilago bullata operative against saprophytism.—Mycologia, xxxii, pp. 275-89. (1942). Comparative value of certain popular fungicidal dusts in the control of head smut (Vstilago bullata) and in the improvement of stands in forage grasses.—Phytopathology, xxxii, p. 5. (1943). Some evident synonymous relationships in certain graminioolous smut fungi.— Mycologia, xxxv, pp. 610-19. (1945). The mode of infection and the incubation period in the stem smut of grasses Vstilago spegazzinii (U. hypodytes).—Phytopathology, xxxv, pp. 525-32.
Page 1 and 2:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI ^ (USTILAGIN
Page 3:
FOREWORD THIS volume was started wh
Page 6 and 7:
6 PBEFACE We also acknowledge the b
Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTION THE smut fungi, which
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION H of bushels of wheat
Page 14 and 15:
FIG. 1. Vstilago avenae on Arrhenat
Page 16:
^^ THE BBITISH SMUT FUNGI Young hea
Page 19 and 20:
BIOLOGY 15 less than the normal, in
Page 21 and 22:
BIOLOGy 17 and united with it, fina
Page 23 and 24:
BIOLOGY 19 eermination in a collect
Page 25 and 26:
BIOLOGY 21 genus, and the manner of
Page 27 and 28:
BIOLOGY 23 species of Entyloma, and
Page 29 and 30:
3036^ BIOLOGY 25 in others. Dickins
Page 31 and 32:
CYTOLOGY THE discovery of nuclei in
Page 33 and 34:
GENETICS INCOMPATIBILITY KNIEP'S di
Page 35 and 36:
GENETICS • 31 direction of growth
Page 37 and 38:
GENETICS 35 when a few sporidia fro
Page 39 and 40:
GENETICS 37 lines retained their di
Page 41 and 42:
TECHNIQUE COLLECTION AND EXAMINATIO
Page 43 and 44:
TECHNIQUE 41 be undesirable. Weak a
Page 45 and 46:
TECHNIQUE 43 in one season (see p.
Page 47 and 48:
TECHNIQUE 45 barley with loose smut
Page 49 and 50:
TECHNIQUE 47 (1939), Holton & Heald
Page 51 and 52:
TECHNIQUE 49 Allen's, modification
Page 53 and 54:
CLASSIFICATION THE morphological ch
Page 55 and 56:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI MOST of the
Page 57 and 58:
FIG. 2. Spore geimination in Ustila
Page 59 and 60:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUJJGI 57 from one
Page 61 and 62:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUKGI 59 of exsert
Page 63 and 64:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 61 noticeabl
Page 65 and 66:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 63 Evidence
Page 67 and 68: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 65 winter in
Page 69 and 70: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 67 Ustilago
Page 71 and 72: THE BRITISH SMUT FUlJGI 69 material
Page 73 and 74: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 71 results o
Page 75 and 76: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 73 TTstilago
Page 77 and 78: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 75 Species i
Page 79 and 80: " TJSE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 77 Ustila
Page 81 and 82: THE BKITISH SMUT FUNGI 79 On Carex
Page 83 and 84: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 81 Exsiccati
Page 85 and 86: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 83 Tilletia
Page 87 and 88: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 85 bunt ball
Page 89 and 90: THE BEITISH SMUT FUNGI 87 globose t
Page 91 and 92: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 89 FIG. 13.
Page 93 and 94: FIG. 15. Spore geimination in Taboi
Page 95 and 96: FIG. 17. Spore germination in Urocy
Page 97 and 98: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 95 separate
Page 99 and 100: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 97 8ori in t
Page 101 and 102: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 99 Urocystis
Page 103 and 104: 30390 THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 101 pr
Page 105 and 106: FIG. 20. Spore geimination in Entyl
Page 107 and 108: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 105 Sori in
Page 109 and 110: On Ranunculus ficariae and B. scler
Page 111 and 112: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 109 Infectio
Page 113 and 114: THE BKITISH SMUT FUNGI 111 [Sporidi
Page 115 and 116: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 113 Ustilago
Page 117: REFEEENCES 115 BBETT, M. A. (1940).
Page 121 and 122: REFERENCES 119 GRIFFITHS, MAEIOK A.
Page 123 and 124: REFERENCES 121 HtjTTiG, W. (1933).
Page 125 and 126: REFEBENCES 123 LiMBOtruN, E. J. (19
Page 127 and 128: REFERENCES 125 NOBLE, E. J. (1934).
Page 129 and 130: REFERENCES 127 RoDENHiSEE, H. A., &
Page 131 and 132: BEFERENCES 129 STAKMAK, E. C, XCEEN
Page 133 and 134: EEFEEENCES 131 WAXTBE, J. M. (1934)
Page 135 and 136: INDEX to generic and specific names
Page 137 and 138: Muscari Ustilago vaillantii, 59 Myo
Page 139 and 140: Ustilago ficuum Reich., 113 —flps
Page 141 and 142: 2i}:y0 ANDHRA PRADESH AGRICULTURAL
show all

nmm sP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?