nmm sP
nmm sP
nmm sP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 85<br />
bunt balls, the size, reticulations, colour, and germination of the chlamydospores,<br />
nuclear behaviour, cultural characters, and in their effect on height and^tUlering<br />
of the host (Bressman (1931), Smith (1932 b), Holton (1933), Young (1935),<br />
Mitra (1935), Holton & Heald (1936), Savelescu & Sandu Ville (1939), Spangenberg<br />
& Gutner (1936), Gassner (1938), Hanna (1932), Kienholz & Heald (1930),<br />
Flor (1933), Becker (1936), Melchers (1934), Churchward (1938 a), Rodenhiser &<br />
Holton (1937).<br />
The name dwarf bunt (Young, 1935) has been given to a variety of T. caries<br />
which causes excessive dwarfing and tillering of infected plants and produces<br />
small, relatively hard balls of spores. These have prominent reticulations,<br />
germinate only after prolonged soaking (or at 5° C, see Lowther, 1948), and give<br />
atypical promycelia (see p. 83) (Holton, 1943), Dwarf bunt is largely soilborne<br />
and attacks only autumn-so^vn wheat in the United States (Bamberg,<br />
1941; Holton & Suneson, 1943; Blodgett, 1944). It is suppressed if grown with<br />
T. caries and T. foetida on the same plant (Bamberg et al., 1947).<br />
Tilletia indica Mitra (1931,1935, 1937) is only distinguished from T. caries by<br />
the size of spore—which is said to be nearly double that of T. caries. At first it<br />
was said to be odourless and to cause only partial swelling of the host, but this<br />
was corrected later.<br />
Varietal resistance. The world-wide search for varieties of wheat immune from<br />
bunt (reviewed in Holton & Heald, 1941) brought to Ught certain highly resistant<br />
varieties used in genetical studies by the workers named: Turkey (Gaines, 1920,<br />
1925 a; Gaines & Singleton, 1926); Hohenheimer (Gaines & Smith, 1933); Hussar,<br />
Martin, White Odessa, Banner Berkeley, Turkey, Sherman, Oro (Briggs, 1926-<br />
40; Schlehuber, 1938; Wismer, 1934; Bryan, 1937; Stanford, 1941); Albit<br />
(Bressman & Harris, 1933; Schlehuber, 1933, 1935); Florence (Churchward,<br />
1931, 1932, 1938 b); Garnet (Kildufif, 1933); and Hope (Smith, W. K., 1933;<br />
Clark et al., 1933; Bryan, 1937; Churchward, 1938 b). Certain varieties, such as<br />
Hope, resistant when spring-sown, are susceptible if sown in the autumn (Smith,<br />
W. K., 1932 a, 1933). The main genetical results of crosses between resistant and<br />
susceptible varieties are presented in tabular form by Holton & Heald (1941).<br />
The most clear-cut evidence of segregation involving only one or two main<br />
factors was obtained when the inoculum consisted of a single physiologic race of<br />
bunt (Briggs, 1926-40; Churchward, 1931-58). Three major factors for resistance,<br />
designated M (Martin), H (Hussar), and T (Turkey) with linkage between<br />
T and M were recognized by Briggs (1940). Some varieties of wheat carry<br />
modifying factors (Briggs, 1929, 1930 c). Resistance is dominant, incompletely<br />
dominant, or recessive according to the cross. Although a single factor for<br />
resistance does not govern the reaction to all forms of bunt, one factor may<br />
function for a group of three or more races (Bressman & Harris, 1933; Smith,<br />
W. K., 1933; Gaines & Smith, 1933). The reaction to certain races of the two<br />
species of Tilletia is controlled by the same gene (Gaines & Smith, 1933; Schlehuber,<br />
1935). In a cross between White Odessa and a Turkey X Florence selection,<br />
with two races of bunt in the inoculum, resistance was apparently governed<br />
by six genes (Schlehuber, 1938). A mixture of physiologic races is often used in<br />
practical plant-breeding (Martin, 1936). Holton & Heald (1936) recommend that<br />
the number be limited to ten, since more may dilute the inoculum with a decHne