nmm sP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$WI LD R LATI\IES CROP PLANTS IN INDIA$

$~\\~SAnfF~~~ ,$

124 THE BKITISH SMtlT FUNGI MOKAY, R. (1936). Method of infection of oat grain with Ustilago avenae and the influence of external factors on the incidence of the disease.—Sci. Proc. roy. Dublin Soc, N S xxi, pp. 27-34, 297-307. , ' '' MEI-CHBBS, L. B. (1934). Investigations on physiologic specialization of Tilletia laevis in Kansas.—Phytopathology, xxiv, pp. 1203-26. MiDDi/ETON, G. K., & CHAPMAN, W. H. (1941). Resistance to floral infecting loose smut {XJstilago nuda) in fall-sown barley varieties at Statesville, North Carolina.—Phytopathology, xxxi, pp. 351-3. ( MrLAN, A. (1928). Contribnto alio studio della biologia di Tilletia tritici and Tilletia laevis. Nuovi Ann. Minist. Agric, viii, pp. 3-24. (1939). Sensibilita per la Ustilago tritici (Pers.) Jens, di alcuni ibridi nomiali di Trumento.—Riv. Pat. veg., xxix, pp. 71-84. MJXI^B, P. W., & MCWHOBTEB, F. P. (1945). Studies on the control of onion smut by seed treatments in Oregon.—Plant Dis. Beptr, xxix, pp. 93-4. MiLLiKAN, C. R., & SIMS, H. J. (1937). The reaction of wheat varieties to flag smut.—
REFERENCES 125 NOBLE, E. J. (1934). Note on the longevity of spores of the fungus Vrocystis tritici Koem.— J. Proc. roy. Soc, N.S.W., Ixviii, pp. 403-10. NovopoKBOVSKY, I. V., & SKASKIN, F. D. (1925). Effect of temperature on the germination of the chlamydospores of cereal smuts (genus Ustilago).-^Pamphlet oftheNorth Caucasus Regional Land Administration, Rostoff-on-Don, 28 pp. OoBT, A. J. P. (1939). Inoculation experiments with loose smuts of wheat and barley. {Ustilago tritici and U. nuda).—Phytopathology, xxix, pp. 717-28. • • (1940). De vatbaarheid voor Stuifbrand van in Nederland verbouwde of beproefde rassen van Tarwe en Gerst.—Meded. Inst. Phytopath. Wageningen 92, 54 pp. (1944). Onderzoekingen over Stuifbrand. ii. Overgevoeligheid van Tarwe voor Stuifbrand {Ustilago tritici).—Meded. Inst. Phytopath. Wageningen 103, 106 pp. (1947). Stuifbrand specialisatie, een problem voor den kweker. Onderzoekingen over stxiifbrand. III. —Tijdschr. PlZiekt., liii, pp. 25-43. OsisTEE, G. A. (1916). Leaf smut of timothy.—Bull. Cornell agric. Exp. Sta. 381, pp. 187-230. OxJDEMANS, C. A. J. A. (1898). Beitrage zur Pilzflora der Niederlande.—Hedwigia, xxxvii, pp. 175-88. PAPE, H. (1926). Eine fur Deutschland neue Blattfieckenkrankbeit der Dahlien.—Gartenwelt, XXX, pp. 632-4; 666-7. PABAVIOINT, E. (1917). Untersuchungen iiber das Verhalten der Zellkeme bei der Fortpilanzung der Brandpilze.—Ann. mycol., Berl., xv, pp. 57-96. PBKU:T,J.(1938). ZurBekampfimgdesMaisbeutenbrandes.—Dtseh.landw.Pr.,hiv,-pp.7-8. PBTHYBEIDOB, G. H. (1928). A new disease of the dahlia.—0dnrs' Chron., Ixxxiv, pp. 393-4. PETTY, MILTON A. (1942). Physical and chemical adaptations and environmental 'carryover' effects in Ustilago zeae.—Abs. in Phytopathology, xxxii, p. 14. PiEKENBEOOK, P. (1927). XJntersuchungen iiber das Verhalten des Ustilago tritici an Sorten imd Kreuzimgen.—HiXhn-Arch., xv, pp. 411-56. PiEMEiSBL, F. J. (1917). Factors affecting the parasitism of Ustilago zeae.—Phytopathology, vii, pp. 294r-307. PiROTTA, R. (1881). Sulla struttura e suUa germinazione delle spore del Sorosporium (?) primulicola (Magn.).—Nuovo G. bat. ital., xiii, pp. 235^40. PLATZ, G. A. (1928). The relation of oxygen to the germination of the chlamydospores of Ustilago zeae (Beck.) Unger,^—Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. ii, pp- 137-43. (1929). Some factors influencing the pathogenicity of Ustilago zeae (Beokm.) Unger.— Iowa Sta. Coll. J. Soi., iii, pp. 177-200. • DTJKBBLL, L. W., & HOWE, MAEY F. (1927). Effect of carbon dioxide upon the germination of chlamydospores of Ustilago zeae (Beokm.) Ung.—J. agric. Res., xxxiv, pp. 137-47. PLOWEIGHT, C. B. (1889). British Uredineae and Ustilagineoe. 347 pp. —— (1892). The Ustilagineae as reproductive parasites.—-ff^^nra' Chron., Ser. 3, xi, p. 429. PoBHLMAiT, J. M. (1945). A simple method of inoculating barley with loose snavA.—Phytopathology, XXXV, pp. 640-4. •—^- (1947). Sovirces of resistance to loose smut, Ustilago nuda, in winter barleys.—J. Amer. Soc. Agron., xxxix, pp. 430-7. PoHjAKALLio, O. (1935). Keimungsversuche mit Cintractia karii Liro.—Ann. bot. Vanamo, vi, pp. 3-10. ^ -^' PoPP, W., & HANNA, W. F. (1935). Studies on the physiology of the oat smuts.—Sci. Agric, XV, pp. 424r-34. PoTTBK, A. D. (1914). Head smut of sorghum and maize.—J. agric. Res., ii, 339-71. PB^VOST, B. (1807). Memoir on the immediate caxise of bunt on smut of wheat and of several other diseases of plants, and of preventives of bunt.—Translated from the French by G. W. Keitt, Phytopath. Classics, 6, 95 pp. PBIDHAM, J. T., & DwYBE, R. E. (1930). Reaction of wheat varieties to flag smut.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., xh, pp. 413-15. PEILLIBTJX, E. (1880). Quelques observations sur la formation et la germination des spores des Urocystis (TJstilaginees).—Ann. Sci. nat., vi, pp. 49-61. RABIEN, H. (1937). tJber Keimungs- und Infektionsbedingungen von Tilletia tritici.—Arb. biol. {Anst.—Reichsanst.), Berl., xv, pp. 297-353. RADOLIITE, ALAN (1940). Hybridization in Ustilago avenac (Pers.) Jens, and Ustilago kolleri (Wille).—UnpubUshed Diss. Univ. Wales. 149 pp. RADULESCU, E. (1935 a). Untersuchungen iiber die physiologische Spezialisierung des Haferflugbrandes, U. avenae (Pers.) Jens.—Pflanzenbau, xi, pp. 295-300. — (1935 b). Untersuchimgen iiber die physiologische Spezialisierung bei Flugbrand des Weizens Ustilago tritici (Pers.) Jens.—Phytopath. Z., viii, pp. 253-8.
Page 1 and 2:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI ^ (USTILAGIN
Page 3:
FOREWORD THIS volume was started wh
Page 6 and 7:
6 PBEFACE We also acknowledge the b
Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTION THE smut fungi, which
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION H of bushels of wheat
Page 14 and 15:
FIG. 1. Vstilago avenae on Arrhenat
Page 16:
^^ THE BBITISH SMUT FUNGI Young hea
Page 19 and 20:
BIOLOGY 15 less than the normal, in
Page 21 and 22:
BIOLOGy 17 and united with it, fina
Page 23 and 24:
BIOLOGY 19 eermination in a collect
Page 25 and 26:
BIOLOGY 21 genus, and the manner of
Page 27 and 28:
BIOLOGY 23 species of Entyloma, and
Page 29 and 30:
3036^ BIOLOGY 25 in others. Dickins
Page 31 and 32:
CYTOLOGY THE discovery of nuclei in
Page 33 and 34:
GENETICS INCOMPATIBILITY KNIEP'S di
Page 35 and 36:
GENETICS • 31 direction of growth
Page 37 and 38:
GENETICS 35 when a few sporidia fro
Page 39 and 40:
GENETICS 37 lines retained their di
Page 41 and 42:
TECHNIQUE COLLECTION AND EXAMINATIO
Page 43 and 44:
TECHNIQUE 41 be undesirable. Weak a
Page 45 and 46:
TECHNIQUE 43 in one season (see p.
Page 47 and 48:
TECHNIQUE 45 barley with loose smut
Page 49 and 50:
TECHNIQUE 47 (1939), Holton & Heald
Page 51 and 52:
TECHNIQUE 49 Allen's, modification
Page 53 and 54:
CLASSIFICATION THE morphological ch
Page 55 and 56:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI MOST of the
Page 57 and 58:
FIG. 2. Spore geimination in Ustila
Page 59 and 60:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUJJGI 57 from one
Page 61 and 62:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUKGI 59 of exsert
Page 63 and 64:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 61 noticeabl
Page 65 and 66:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 63 Evidence
Page 67 and 68:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 65 winter in
Page 69 and 70:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 67 Ustilago
Page 71 and 72:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUlJGI 69 material
Page 73 and 74:
THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 71 results o
Page 75 and 76: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 73 TTstilago
Page 77 and 78: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 75 Species i
Page 79 and 80: " TJSE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 77 Ustila
Page 81 and 82: THE BKITISH SMUT FUNGI 79 On Carex
Page 83 and 84: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 81 Exsiccati
Page 85 and 86: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 83 Tilletia
Page 87 and 88: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 85 bunt ball
Page 89 and 90: THE BEITISH SMUT FUNGI 87 globose t
Page 91 and 92: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 89 FIG. 13.
Page 93 and 94: FIG. 15. Spore geimination in Taboi
Page 95 and 96: FIG. 17. Spore germination in Urocy
Page 97 and 98: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 95 separate
Page 99 and 100: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 97 8ori in t
Page 101 and 102: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 99 Urocystis
Page 103 and 104: 30390 THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 101 pr
Page 105 and 106: FIG. 20. Spore geimination in Entyl
Page 107 and 108: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 105 Sori in
Page 109 and 110: On Ranunculus ficariae and B. scler
Page 111 and 112: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 109 Infectio
Page 113 and 114: THE BKITISH SMUT FUNGI 111 [Sporidi
Page 115 and 116: THE BRITISH SMUT FUNGI 113 Ustilago
Page 117 and 118: REFEEENCES 115 BBETT, M. A. (1940).
Page 119 and 120: REFERENCES 117 ^ DniON WESTON, W. A
Page 121 and 122: REFERENCES 119 GRIFFITHS, MAEIOK A.
Page 123 and 124: REFERENCES 121 HtjTTiG, W. (1933).
Page 125: REFEBENCES 123 LiMBOtruN, E. J. (19
Page 129 and 130: REFERENCES 127 RoDENHiSEE, H. A., &
Page 131 and 132: BEFERENCES 129 STAKMAK, E. C, XCEEN
Page 133 and 134: EEFEEENCES 131 WAXTBE, J. M. (1934)
Page 135 and 136: INDEX to generic and specific names
Page 137 and 138: Muscari Ustilago vaillantii, 59 Myo
Page 139 and 140: Ustilago ficuum Reich., 113 —flps
Page 141 and 142: 2i}:y0 ANDHRA PRADESH AGRICULTURAL
show all

nmm sP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?