13.07.2013 Views

nmm sP

nmm sP

nmm sP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BEFERENCES 129<br />

STAKMAK, E. C, XCEENKAJIP, N. F., THOMAS, H. K., & MABTIN, W. J. (1943). Genetic factors<br />

for mutability and mutant characters in Ustilago zeae.—Amer. J. Bot., xxx, pp. 37-48.<br />

TYLER, L. J., & HAFSTAD, G. E. (1933). The constancy of cultural characters<br />

and pathogenicity in variant lines of Ustilago zeae.—Bull. Torrey bot. CI. Ix, pp.<br />

565-72.<br />

& SHABVBI;LE, E. G. (1935). Experiments on physiologic specialization and<br />

nature of variation in Ustilago zeae.—Phytopathology, xxv, p. 34<br />

STANPOED, E. H. (1941). A new factor for resistance to bunt, Tilletia tritici linked with the<br />

Martin and Turkey factors.—J. Amer. Soc. Agron., xxxiii, pp. 559-68.<br />

STANTON, T. R. (1933). Navarro oats.—J. Amer. Soc. Agron., xxv, pp. 108-12.<br />

BBED, G. M., & COPFMAN, F. A. (1934). Inheritance of resistance to loose smut and<br />

covered smut in some oat hybrids.—J. agric. Res., xlviii, pp. 1073-83.<br />

SHEPHERD, D. E., & GAINES, E. F. (1924). Markton, an oat variety immune from<br />

covered smut.—Circ. U.S. Dept. Agric, 324, 8 pp.<br />

STAPLEDON, R. G. (1921). Variety trials with oats.—Bull. Welsh Plant Breed. Sta., Ser. C,<br />

i, pp. 28-31.<br />

STEMPBLL, K. L. (1935). Studien fiber die Entwicklungsgesehichte einiger Entyloma-Arten<br />

und xiber die systematische Stellung der Familie der Sporobolomycetes.—Z. Bot.,<br />

xxviii, pp. 225-59.<br />

STEVENS, F. L. (1913). The fungi which cause plant disease. 754 pp.<br />

STEVENS, H. (1936). The eiiect of latent infection on the smut-resistant Markton oat.—<br />

J. Amer. Soc. Agron., xxviii, pp. 711-13.<br />

STEVENSON, J. A., & JOHNSON, A. G. (1944). The nomenclature of the cereal smut fungi.—<br />

Plant Dis. Beptr, xxviii, pp. 663-70.<br />

SzBMBEL, S. J. (1926). Some observations on the biology of the smut fungus Urocystis<br />

cepulae Frost.—La Defense des Plantes, Leningr., ii, pp. 524^30 (R.A.M., v, p. 646)<br />

TALIEFF, V. I., & GRIGOROVITOH, A. I. (1923). On the influence of smut on the host plant.—<br />

Trans, mycol. phytopath. Sect., Russinn bot. Soc, i. Trans. Moscow Branch, 47-53,<br />

[French sunimary].<br />

TAPKB, V. E. (1924). Effects of the modified hot-water treatment on germination, growth<br />

and yield of wheat.-^-J. agric Res., xxviii, pp. 79-97.<br />

(1929). Influence of varietal resistance, sap acidity, and'certain environmental factors<br />

on the occurrence of loose smut in wheat.—J. agric Res., xxxix, pp. 313-39.<br />

(1931). Influence of humidity on floral infection of wheat and barley by loose smut.—<br />

J. agric Res., xUii, pp. 503-16.<br />

(1932). An undescribed loose smut oi haxley.—Phytopathology, xxii, pp. 869-70.<br />

(1935 a). A study of the cause of variabihty in response of barley loose smut to control<br />

through seed treatment with surface disinfectants.—J. agric Bes., li, pp. 491-508.<br />

(1935 b). An eSective and easily applied method of inoculating seed barley with<br />

covered smut.—Phytopathology, xxv, pp. 1038-9.<br />

(1936). Pathogenic strains of Ustilago nigra.—Phytopathology, xxvi, pp. 1033-4.<br />

•—— (1937 a). A method of inoculating seed barley with black loose smut for use in studies on<br />

physiologic races.—Phytopathology, xxvii, pp. 115—16.<br />

—— (1937 b). Physiologic races of Ustilago hordei.—J. agric. Res., Iv, pp. 683-92.<br />

— (1938). Influence of environment, after seedling emergence, on covered smut in<br />

barley.—Phytopathology, xxviii, pp. 370-1. ^^ *<br />

-——• (1940). Studies on the natural inoculation of seed barley with covered smut.—J. agric.<br />

Res., Ix, pp. 787-810.<br />

(1941). A technique for identifying loose smut of barley.—Phytopathology, xxxi,<br />

pp. 284-6.<br />

(1943 a). Occurrence, identification, and species validity of the barley loose smuts,<br />

Ustilago nvda, U. nigra, and U. medians.^^Phytopathology, xxxiii, pp. 194^209.<br />

(1943 b). Physiologic races of Ustilago nigra.—Phytopathology, xxxiii, pp. 324^7.<br />

(1944). Evidence of hybridization between physiologic races of Ustilago hordei in<br />

passage through host.—Abs. in Phytopathology, xxxiv, p. 993.<br />

(1945). New physiologic races of Ustilago hordei.—Phytopathology, xxxv, pp. 970-6.<br />

(1948). Environment and the cereal smuts.—Bot. Rev., xiv, pp. 359-412.<br />

& BEVEE, W. M. (1942). Effective methods of inoculating seed barley with covered<br />

smut (Ustilago hordei).—Phytopathology, xxxii, pp. 1015-21.<br />

THAXTER, R. (1890). On certain fungus diseases of the onion (Allium cepa).—Rep. Conn.<br />

agric Exp. Sta. 1889, pp. 129-53.<br />

THIBTTMALACHAB, M. J., & DICKSON, J. G. (1947). Chlamydospbre germination and artificial<br />

culture of Ustilago striiformis from timothy and blue grass.—Phytopathology, xxxvii,<br />

pp. 730-4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!