nmm sP
nmm sP
nmm sP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
^^ THE BBITISH SMUT FUNGI<br />
Young healthy mycelium is full of granular protoplasm with an affinity for<br />
stains, such as gentian violet, saffranin, and fast green, but in older tissue<br />
portions of the mycelium may be empty and coUapsed, sometimes having the<br />
form of a long filiform strand, sometimes thick with an enveloping sheath<br />
(Kolk, 1930; Woolman, 1930; Western, 1936 b; Evans, 1933). It is not always<br />
easy to find mycehum in older plants, but it does not disappear entirely, and<br />
sometimes sporulation occurs in late tillers induced to develop by removing<br />
those first formed and smut-free.<br />
Some smuts which attack perennial plants are systemic, hibernating in underground<br />
stems or bulbs and reappearing each year to form spores in the appropriate<br />
part of the host. Mycelium of Ustilago vaillantii, for example, can be<br />
found at the base of bulbs of the grape hyacinth, where the mycelium forms<br />
botryform haustoria, consisting of a cluster of short inflated branches. Each<br />
year mycelium passes into the young inflorescence and sporulates in the anthers,<br />
replacing the pale yellow pollen by dark chlamydospores but having otherwise<br />
little effect on the host (Massee, 1914). De Bary recorded a plant of Saponaria<br />
officinalis in the Freiburg Botanic Garden, which was for ten successive years<br />
affected with U. violacea, and Plowright refers to plants in his garden at King's<br />
Lynn of Golchicum autumnale, Agropyron repens, and Arrhenatherum elatius<br />
which carried their respective smuts for at least six years (Plowright, 1889).<br />
Among the perennial economic grasses infected by a smut mention may be<br />
made of timothy and smooth-stalked meadow grass, which are sometimes<br />
severely injured by stripe smut (Davis, 1926; Kreitlow & Myers, 1944). ^<br />
In some smut diseases the area of infection is localized, the fungus sporulating<br />
not far from the seat of invasion. U. maydis, for example, which attacks<br />
axiUary buds or young floral organs, produces in a comparatively short time<br />
small or large swellings containing spores. Each gall or ball usually represents<br />
a separate infection. Species of Entyloma, which attack the leaves of many<br />
different plants, form angular Ibsions, the chlamydospores developing round<br />
each infection centre in a typical leaf spot, except where very heavy infection<br />
destroys the whole lamina.<br />
Before emergence of the ear it is not possible to distinguish with certainty<br />
in the field plants of wheat, oats, or barley systemicly infected by smuts, but<br />
careful records and measurements have shown that the growth of the host is<br />
affected in several ways. Oat plants carrying smut produce extra tUlers, while<br />
growth in height is often considerably reduced (Talieff & Grigorovitch, 1923;<br />
Sampson, 1929; Welsh, 1932). Even smut-resistant varieties may be adversely<br />
affected in growth and vigour (Hubbard & Stanton, 1934; Stevens, 1936).<br />
Bunt of wheat may either promote or retard tillering but it almost" invariably<br />
reduces height (Zade, 1931; Lang, 1917a; Mourashkinsky, 1925; Viennot-<br />
Bourgin, 1937), the magnitude of the effect depending on the variety and the<br />
physiologic race of the fungus (Holton, 1935; Aamodt e( aL, 1936; Schlehuber,<br />
1937). The effect of bunt on the form of the wheat ear also varies. A broadawned<br />
ear like that of American Club (Triticnim compactum), if bunted, is<br />
abnormally long and awnless; a lax ear, like that of Hen Gymro (T. vulgare),<br />
when attacked by bunt is shorter and the awns are also reduced in length<br />
(Sampson & Davies, 1927; DiUon Weston, 1929). Wheat plants infected by<br />
U. nuda are said to be markedly stunted and their dry weight at flowering time