full Paper - Nguyen Dang Binh
full Paper - Nguyen Dang Binh
full Paper - Nguyen Dang Binh
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 27: Differential tendon tension sensor<br />
placed near the joint (see Figure 26). In such cases, the fact<br />
that the tendons driving a joint are routed over the preceeding<br />
joints, causes a coupling in the relationship between motor<br />
variables (angular displacements and torques) and joint<br />
variables. Multi strands, steel cables, with a diameter of 2<br />
mm, are used as tendons; the tendons are routed over pulleys<br />
mounted on ball bearings. Pretensioning is obtained with a<br />
regulation mechanism located at the driven pulleys.<br />
9.4. Sensors<br />
Resolvers, mounted on the motor shafts, are used in order<br />
to have high resolution in the position measurement and in<br />
order to have a direct velocity measurement available to implement<br />
damping control.<br />
On purposely developed, differential tendon tension sensors<br />
are employed, in order to measure joint torques (see Figure<br />
27). Such sensors use strain gauge <strong>full</strong> bridges as sensing<br />
elements. They are equipped with local electronics for signal<br />
conditioning in order to improve signal to noise ratio.<br />
The performance of the sensor module is summarized in Table<br />
4. The sensing resolution is adapted to the requirement<br />
of each joint, by varying the incidence angle of the cables on<br />
the sensor frame.<br />
10. Design analysis<br />
An analysis of the global results of the design has been performed<br />
iteratively during the design process, in order to evaluate<br />
the impact of some solutions on the most critical global<br />
performance indexes. Three sets of global properties of the<br />
haptic interface have been kept under control:<br />
¯ the masses and inertia tensors of the links;<br />
c The Eurographics Association 2005.<br />
Massimo Bergamasco / Haptic Interfaces<br />
21<br />
¯ the worst-case end point stiffness of the device;<br />
¯ the worst-case mechanical bandwidths of the joints.<br />
10.1. Link inertial properties<br />
The estimation of the mass and inertia tensors of the links<br />
has been obtained directly by the 3D CAD design environment.<br />
In this way, every single mechanical part, up to the<br />
screws, has been taken into consideration; we have also been<br />
able to evaluate the gain in mass which is realizable by using<br />
special materials, such as composite material or carbon fiber,<br />
instead of aluminium, for the structural parts.<br />
The results of the analysis have shown that the greatest<br />
impact on link masses is due to the actuator modules, each<br />
integrating an unhoused pancake rotor/stator, a resolver and<br />
a mechanical frame. In fact, from Table 5, it is noticeable the<br />
high masses of links 0 and 4, which house respectively four<br />
and three actuator modules. A second significant contribution<br />
to the link masses is represented by the steel parts, such<br />
as torque sensor frames, ball bearing, idlers and pulleys.<br />
10.2. Stiffness<br />
The estimation of the worst-case end point stiffness of the<br />
device has required a special care, because of the complexity<br />
of the mechanism. From a methodological point of view, the<br />
correct computation of the end-point stiffness has required to<br />
take into account the contribution of both the link structural<br />
parts and the tendons. The worst case has been identified as<br />
occurring when the human arm is completely stretched in<br />
the front (the joint angles values in such case are reported<br />
in Table 6). In Figure 28 and 29, the diagrams representing<br />
the displacement magnitudes, under a general load condition,<br />
are reported. The elastic constant along z, which is by<br />
far the worst direction, is 18Nmm.<br />
References<br />
[1]. Lederman S.J., Klatzky R.L., “Haptic Exploration and<br />
Object Representation,” in M.A. Goodale (Ed.), Vision and<br />
Transversal force Max 200 N<br />
Min -200 N<br />
Transversal torque Max 2 Nm<br />
Min -2 Nm<br />
Overload factor 1.5<br />
Force resolution 0.1 N<br />
Force accuracy 2.0 N<br />
Table 4: Performance of the torque sensor module