23.07.2013 Views

full Paper - Nguyen Dang Binh

full Paper - Nguyen Dang Binh

full Paper - Nguyen Dang Binh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 27: Differential tendon tension sensor<br />

placed near the joint (see Figure 26). In such cases, the fact<br />

that the tendons driving a joint are routed over the preceeding<br />

joints, causes a coupling in the relationship between motor<br />

variables (angular displacements and torques) and joint<br />

variables. Multi strands, steel cables, with a diameter of 2<br />

mm, are used as tendons; the tendons are routed over pulleys<br />

mounted on ball bearings. Pretensioning is obtained with a<br />

regulation mechanism located at the driven pulleys.<br />

9.4. Sensors<br />

Resolvers, mounted on the motor shafts, are used in order<br />

to have high resolution in the position measurement and in<br />

order to have a direct velocity measurement available to implement<br />

damping control.<br />

On purposely developed, differential tendon tension sensors<br />

are employed, in order to measure joint torques (see Figure<br />

27). Such sensors use strain gauge <strong>full</strong> bridges as sensing<br />

elements. They are equipped with local electronics for signal<br />

conditioning in order to improve signal to noise ratio.<br />

The performance of the sensor module is summarized in Table<br />

4. The sensing resolution is adapted to the requirement<br />

of each joint, by varying the incidence angle of the cables on<br />

the sensor frame.<br />

10. Design analysis<br />

An analysis of the global results of the design has been performed<br />

iteratively during the design process, in order to evaluate<br />

the impact of some solutions on the most critical global<br />

performance indexes. Three sets of global properties of the<br />

haptic interface have been kept under control:<br />

¯ the masses and inertia tensors of the links;<br />

c­ The Eurographics Association 2005.<br />

Massimo Bergamasco / Haptic Interfaces<br />

21<br />

¯ the worst-case end point stiffness of the device;<br />

¯ the worst-case mechanical bandwidths of the joints.<br />

10.1. Link inertial properties<br />

The estimation of the mass and inertia tensors of the links<br />

has been obtained directly by the 3D CAD design environment.<br />

In this way, every single mechanical part, up to the<br />

screws, has been taken into consideration; we have also been<br />

able to evaluate the gain in mass which is realizable by using<br />

special materials, such as composite material or carbon fiber,<br />

instead of aluminium, for the structural parts.<br />

The results of the analysis have shown that the greatest<br />

impact on link masses is due to the actuator modules, each<br />

integrating an unhoused pancake rotor/stator, a resolver and<br />

a mechanical frame. In fact, from Table 5, it is noticeable the<br />

high masses of links 0 and 4, which house respectively four<br />

and three actuator modules. A second significant contribution<br />

to the link masses is represented by the steel parts, such<br />

as torque sensor frames, ball bearing, idlers and pulleys.<br />

10.2. Stiffness<br />

The estimation of the worst-case end point stiffness of the<br />

device has required a special care, because of the complexity<br />

of the mechanism. From a methodological point of view, the<br />

correct computation of the end-point stiffness has required to<br />

take into account the contribution of both the link structural<br />

parts and the tendons. The worst case has been identified as<br />

occurring when the human arm is completely stretched in<br />

the front (the joint angles values in such case are reported<br />

in Table 6). In Figure 28 and 29, the diagrams representing<br />

the displacement magnitudes, under a general load condition,<br />

are reported. The elastic constant along z, which is by<br />

far the worst direction, is 18Nmm.<br />

References<br />

[1]. Lederman S.J., Klatzky R.L., “Haptic Exploration and<br />

Object Representation,” in M.A. Goodale (Ed.), Vision and<br />

Transversal force Max 200 N<br />

Min -200 N<br />

Transversal torque Max 2 Nm<br />

Min -2 Nm<br />

Overload factor 1.5<br />

Force resolution 0.1 N<br />

Force accuracy 2.0 N<br />

Table 4: Performance of the torque sensor module

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!