02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the launcher design is partly “trial and error,” with the consequence that launchers almost always<br />

have to be reconfigured after initial tests in a given device, at an additional cost. Recent Jet experience<br />

with the new iteR-like antenna has included in excess of 100 shifts of machine operation<br />

to learn how to operate it. The second most serious gap is a quantitative lack of understanding<br />

of the combined effects of nonlinear wave-plasma processes, energetic particle interactions and<br />

non-axisymmetric equilibrium effects on determining the overall efficiency of plasma equilibrium<br />

and stability profile control techniques using radiofrequency waves. This is complicated by a<br />

corresponding lack of predictive understanding of the time evolution of transport and stability<br />

processes in fusion plasmas.<br />

Antennas<br />

ion cyclotron and lh utilization is often limited in present experiments as a result of the antenna<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance. in future devices, several additional issues are likely: coupling at long distance; compatibility<br />

of high-per<strong>for</strong>mance, steady-state discharges and metallic plasma facing components;<br />

reliably maintaining coupled power despite load variations; ability to deliver radiofrequency power<br />

on demand without burdensome antenna conditioning; and compatibility with the nuclear environment.<br />

The development and validation of a simulation tool that can properly handle complicated<br />

antenna structure and the relevant plasma physics are critical. The challenge is to couple<br />

electromagnetic simulation of the antenna in the plasma edge with the core absorption modeled<br />

correctly. This situation is further complicated by nonlinear physics resulting from the strong radiofrequency<br />

fields in the sol. current devices can contribute to validation of such codes through<br />

comparison with experiment. detailed measurements of the plasma potential modification and<br />

localization of erosion and impurity sources will be important.<br />

Sources<br />

cW high-power sources exist <strong>for</strong> both icRF and lh applications. The major issue is maximizing<br />

tube lifetime. to address long pulse and lifetime issues, a full test stand would require long pulse<br />

supplies and sufficient long pulse load capability.<br />

External Components<br />

both lh and icRF require external radiofrequency components to split power, maintain phase<br />

control, match the source to the antenna structure (<strong>for</strong> icRF) and protect the source from transients<br />

caused by plasma events. current research strategy is to isolate the transmitter from the<br />

plasma-induced load variations. This has led to a number of different approaches to provide isolation,<br />

both passive and active. The passive approaches have gained more acceptance than active<br />

load following. The passive approaches, however, tend to trade efficiency and/or flexibility in favor<br />

of load tolerance. accurate predictions of antenna loads would allow development of network<br />

solutions that maximize system efficiency and flexibility. another approach (suitable <strong>for</strong> icRF)<br />

is to develop active matching networks, such as ferrite-based tuners, with minimal losses that<br />

will maximize the delivered power over a range of plasma conditions. a combination of both test<br />

stand and experimental demonstration would be required <strong>for</strong> qualification.<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!