02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• identification and stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes by electron cyclotron<br />

current drive.<br />

• identification and stabilization of resistive wall mode instabilities by the application of<br />

non-axisymmetric magnetic fields.<br />

• suppression of elms by the application of non-axisymmetric magnetic fields.<br />

• identification of various types of elms and the discovery of tokamak operational regimes<br />

that are elm-free.<br />

• observation of alpha particle loss due to instabilities in d-t plasmas.<br />

SCiEnCE CHaLLEngES, OPPORtunitiES, anD RESEaRCH nEEDS<br />

Disruptions<br />

disruptions and disruption-like loss-of-vertical-stability events, called vertical displacement<br />

events (vdes), pose significant design and operational challenges <strong>for</strong> iteR and <strong>for</strong> subsequent<br />

reactor tokamaks in general. in iteR, the consequences of disruptions are anticipated to be more<br />

severe than in present-day devices. electromagnetic loadings and area/size-normalized body <strong>for</strong>ces<br />

increase modestly (~3 times) from present tokamaks to iteR and can be accommodated in the<br />

corresponding structural designs. however, the time-weighted energy deposition onto plasma<br />

facing components in iteR and demo will be an order of magnitude greater than in present tokamaks<br />

and could approach or exceed thresholds <strong>for</strong> the onset of tungsten surface melting (or<br />

carbon vaporization). avalanche multiplication of a highly energetic electron population (known<br />

as runaway electrons) may occur during disruption, vertical displacement events, or fast-shutdown<br />

current decays (the latter effected by gas or pellet injection). The avalanche gain <strong>for</strong> this process,<br />

G aval @ exp[2.5I(ma)], is sufficiently high that even very minute levels of “seed” runaway current<br />

can convert to a very large population (> 5 ma) of ~10 mev electrons. subsequent deposition<br />

of these electrons on plasma facing components could cause considerable damage.<br />

Relative to present-day devices, disruption avoidance in iteR is significantly more challenging<br />

(see Figure 11). estimates indicate that large improvements in two metrics <strong>for</strong> “disruptivity” relative<br />

to present experiments are needed: viz., a 10-fold reduction in per-pulse disruption rate (discharge<br />

setup reliability) and a 1000-fold reduction in per-second disruption rate (flattop/burn<br />

sustenance reliability).<br />

For future burning plasmas, accurate prediction of an impending disruption is a key element of<br />

both avoidance and mitigation of disruptions. it will be essential (1) to develop plasma operation<br />

and control procedures that avoid, wherever possible, occurrence of disruption onset, (2) to identify<br />

means to reliably predict pending onset of disruption, and (3) to have means available to mitigate<br />

the consequences of disruptions that cannot otherwise be avoided. in developing strategies<br />

<strong>for</strong> disruption prediction, avoidance, and mitigation, it will also be essential to develop quantitative<br />

metrics to characterize and model disruptions and disruption consequences. in all four categories,<br />

there are substantial “gaps” or open issues.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!