02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2. Outer surface of a stellarator plasma surrounded by the nonplanar magnet coils that produce the<br />

plasma configuration within (courtesy of P. garabedian 1 ).<br />

although more complex, many stellarator systems have been successfully built and operated.<br />

Plasma parameters achieved to date are second only to tokamaks. large stellarators are pursued<br />

overseas: lhd in Japan (operating) and W7-X in Germany (2014). The 3-d nature of stellarators<br />

can lead to unacceptably large thermal transport in reactor-relevant regimes and poor confinement<br />

of the energetic fusion products. as a result, stellarators must, and can, be optimized<br />

through 3-d shaping to eliminate these losses. The W7-X design was optimized by aligning particle<br />

drift orbits with magnetic surfaces and having minimal plasma currents. The Us program is<br />

focused on optimization through quasi-symmetry (symmetry in the magnitude of the magnetic<br />

field in a particular direction). Quasi-symmetry ensures the same good particle orbits that true<br />

symmetry provides in the tokamak. The Us is a world leader in this concept, and its viability has<br />

been demonstrated in hot electron plasmas in the university-scale helically symmetric experiment<br />

(hsX). Quasi-symmetry allows both lower flow damping (important <strong>for</strong> reducing turbulent<br />

transport) and smaller plasma aspect ratio than in W7-X, and thus provides a potentially improved<br />

solution <strong>for</strong> steady-state, stable, thermal plasma containment, with good confinement of<br />

energetic fusion products.<br />

Quasi-symmetry in a torus can be achieved in either the toroidal direction (long way around the<br />

torus; known as quasi-axisymmetry or Qa), the poloidal direction (short way around the torus;<br />

known as quasi-poloidal symmetry or QP), or in a helical direction (known as quasi-helical symmetry<br />

or Qh). all of these quasi-symmetries are predicted to ensure well confined particle orbits.<br />

significant differences among these configurations do, however, exist. as one example, Qa has<br />

a significant toroidal current driven by the plasma pressure gradient (bootstrap current) in contrast<br />

to similar plasmas in Qh or QP configurations. other differences include global and local<br />

magnetic shear, field curvature, location and fraction of trapped particles, magnetic well depth,<br />

and plasma viscosity. a proper selection of type of quasi-symmetry and magnetic field optimization<br />

may provide passive control of not only collisional transport and energetic particle confine-<br />

1 P. Garabedian, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. <strong>US</strong>A 104, 12250 (2007).<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!