02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tHEME 5: OPtiMizing tHE MagnEtiC COnFiguRatiOn<br />

1. P.m. bellan, Improving spheromak helicity injection by eliminating the constraint imposed by<br />

Paschen breakdown physics<br />

2. e.v. belova, m. yamada, h. Ji, s. Gerhardt, Oblate FRC concept with NBI <strong>for</strong> experimental<br />

studies of large-s FRC <strong>for</strong>mation, stability, current drive and transport<br />

3. a. boozer, G.h. neilson, and m. zarnstorff, Non-Axisymmetric Shaping as a <strong>Research</strong> Thrust<br />

4. R.J. buttery, The Need <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Fusion</strong> Science Integration Experiment in the <strong>US</strong><br />

5. J.m. canik, a. sontag, m. cole, m. kotchenreuther, P. valanju, Limiting the Divertor Heat<br />

Flux to Enable <strong>Fusion</strong> Nuclear Science <strong>Research</strong> at Low-A<br />

6. s.a. cohen, Improving energy confinement is the most rapid route to practical FRC reactors<br />

7. d.J. den hartog, Measurement needs <strong>for</strong> the alternates, with broader connections<br />

8. s. diem, d. batchelor, v. chan, a.m. Garofalo, y.k.-m. Peng, d. spong and a. sontag,<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Thrust to Establish Predictive Simulation Capability <strong>for</strong> <strong>Fusion</strong> Nuclear Science<br />

9. l. el-Guebaly and R. Raffray, Impact of Tritium Breeding on Design Implications to Withstand<br />

Disruptions and Runaway Electrons<br />

10. l. el-Guebaly, Need <strong>for</strong> High Tritium Burn-up Fraction in Plasma to Relax Tritium Breeding<br />

Requirement <strong>for</strong> Demo and <strong>Fusion</strong> Power Plants<br />

11. R.J. Goldston, J. menard, and s.a. sabbagh, Contributions of NHTX to the ST Development<br />

Path<br />

12. l.R. Grisham, Neutral Beam Development Plans and <strong>Needs</strong> <strong>for</strong> ITER<br />

13. a.l. hoffman, l.c. steinhauer, h. Ferrari, and R. Farengo, Advances in Singly-Connected<br />

Closed Field Line Plasma Devices and Extrapolation to POP Level Experiments and Reactors<br />

14. W. horton, J. Pratt, a.W. molvik, R.m. kulsrud, and n.J. Fisch, Axisymmetric Tandem<br />

Mirror D-T Neutron Source<br />

15. P. innocente, m.e. Puiatti, and m. valisa, Density limits and control in RFP’s<br />

16. t.P. intrator and R.P. majeski, Radio frequency sustainment and current drive <strong>for</strong> Compact<br />

Tori<br />

17. t.P. intrator, t. Jarboe, and R.l. miller, Reactor considerations <strong>for</strong> Compact Toroids<br />

18. i. R. Jones, Some thoughts on the future direction of rotamak research<br />

19. m. kotschenreuther, s. m. mahajan, P. valanju, J.m. canik, a.m. Garofalo, b. labombard,<br />

and R. maingi, Severe divertor issues on next step devices, and validating the Super-X divertor<br />

as a promising solution<br />

410

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!