02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to carry out the validation program, we will enlist a hierarchy of new and existing experiments,<br />

including a spectrum of laboratory-scale devices along with the major confinement experiments<br />

with their complement of sophisticated diagnostics. logically, the comparisons should proceed<br />

in phases, proceeding from the simplest systems to the most complex (see Figure 2). each level<br />

represents a different degree of physics coupling and geometric complexity. The most basic tests<br />

attempt to isolate particular physical phenomena in the simplest geometry (a “Unit Problem”).<br />

dedicated experiments, with specialized diagnostics, will be required at this stage and some comparisons<br />

with analytic solutions may be possible. as experience is gained, researchers can be more<br />

confident when modeling more “realistic” cases (“complete systems”). note that as the hierarchy<br />

is traversed, the number of code runs and experiments tends to decrease. The quality and quantity<br />

(especially spatial coverage) tend to decrease as well, while experimental errors and uncertainties<br />

increase. in<strong>for</strong>mation on boundary and initial conditions decreases as well. These trends<br />

suggest that at least as much attention should be paid to the lower levels of the hierarchy as to the<br />

top. These arguments may lead to requirements <strong>for</strong> new small-scale devices and/or substantially<br />

improved diagnostics on existing ones. an ef<strong>for</strong>t to identify opportunities at this scale should<br />

be undertaken to identify focused physics issues that could be addressed, stressing the “universality”<br />

of the issues and their relevance in fusion plasmas. a further challenge will be to provide<br />

codes that have appropriate geometry and work in appropriate regimes <strong>for</strong> each class of problems,<br />

a considerable task. on the larger experiments, which probe regimes of direct relevance to fusion<br />

energy, adequate run time and support must be made available.<br />

The actual process of validation will be a collaboration among theorists, computationalists, and<br />

experimentalists led by dedicated analysts who are not tied to particular code development or experimental<br />

teams. These bridge the gap between specialized groups and are well placed to provide<br />

unbiased, dispassionate assessments. This role is well recognized in fields where codes of high<br />

consequence are employed. The analysts would have the primary role in defining validation tests<br />

and diagnostic needs, in coordination with modelers and the experimental teams, and would carry<br />

out much of the analysis and documentation of those tests. They would help marshal the substantial<br />

computer time and experimental run time required by the validation program. a particularly<br />

important activity would be the development of visualization tools, post processors and<br />

synthetic diagnostics to make the comparison between codes and experiments more direct and<br />

quantitative. The results of the validation experiments would feed back into the model development<br />

activities, guiding ef<strong>for</strong>ts to explain and resolve the discrepancies that are uncovered.<br />

Scale of Ef<strong>for</strong>t and Readiness <strong>for</strong> Thrust<br />

significant resources would be required to pursue this Thrust with real vigor. each element described<br />

would benefit from increased attention, better coordination and more funding. Theory is<br />

at the foundation, providing the conceptual models and mathematical <strong>for</strong>mulations, interpreting<br />

the results of computations by identifying important physical processes. There will be a need <strong>for</strong><br />

both small and large code teams, each working on problems appropriate <strong>for</strong> their level of organization.<br />

small teams are essential <strong>for</strong> exploratory work where flexibility and agility are critical<br />

<strong>for</strong> success and where parallel ef<strong>for</strong>ts must be maintained. access to specialists in applied math<br />

is beneficial to groups of all sizes, providing support <strong>for</strong> numerical methods and algorithms that<br />

can qualitatively improve computational speed. as models mature and prove their utility, greater<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t is justified and a greater range of skills is required to make codes more robust and suitable<br />

282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!