02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• based on these assessments, proceed with either iteR enhancements or a Us d-t facility,<br />

or both.<br />

The integrated core dynamics thrust is focused on the exploration of high-per<strong>for</strong>mance fusion<br />

core plasmas relevant to a magnetic fusion demo, in which the alpha power dominates the input<br />

power, the plasma current is dominated by the self-driven bootstrap current, and the strongly<br />

coupled nonlinear physics of the plasma provides a stable combination of plasma transport and<br />

mhd that allows the configuration to be sustained in steady state. The scientific challenges lie<br />

in establishing these configurations and utilizing our physics understanding to sustain and optimize<br />

them. The active control of such a plasma through fueling and pumping, heating, current<br />

drive, and rotation will be challenging and will require coupled controllers on a level not needed<br />

on present tokamaks or even iteR, to be developed in Thrust 5.<br />

The exploration of the high-per<strong>for</strong>mance fusion core plasma regime is a fundamental step<br />

to verify the existence of viable plasmas <strong>for</strong> fusion power production.<br />

1. Thrust activities<br />

The basic parameters of interest <strong>for</strong> a high-per<strong>for</strong>mance fusion core plasma, based on power plant<br />

studies, and motivated by the physics requirements in chapter 2, are shown in table 1, along with<br />

supporting elements. These parameters must be obtained simultaneously. key activities <strong>for</strong> this<br />

Thrust are described below, and should occur in parallel. The activities identified can benefit from<br />

activities in other thrusts, as described in the summary.<br />

b no wall<br />

n < bn < b with wall<br />

n high normalized plasma pressure<br />

b ped<br />

n ≈ 0.5-1.0 high normalized plasma pressure near the plasma edge<br />

3 < q95 < 5 degree of magnetic field twist near the plasma edge<br />

i non-inductive /i plasma = 1 high fraction of plasma current not provided by an external solenoid<br />

0.65 < (i bootstrap /i plasma ) < 0.90 high fraction of plasma self-generated current<br />

n/nGr ≈ 1<br />

Ratio of plasma particle density relative to an empirical limit approaching<br />

one<br />

Palpha /Pinput ≈ 4-9 high ratio of plasma self-generated power to externally injected power<br />

Prad,core /(Palpha +Pinput ) ≈ 0.35-0.5<br />

significant ratio of power radiated from the plasma core relative to the<br />

total power heating the plasma<br />

zeff < 2.5 Weighted sum of ion charge in the plasma, sufficient plasma purity<br />

t pulse >> t J<br />

supporting elements.<br />

Plasma operation time long compared to the current profile redistribution<br />

time<br />

efficient fueling and pumping, with particle control of the d-t fuel, he ash, and impurities.<br />

efficient coupling of heating and current drive power into the plasma.<br />

consistent pedestal density and temperature to provide high core per<strong>for</strong>mance with fueling and divertor compatibility.<br />

multi-level feedback control on parameters ranging from plasma shape to current profile to mhd modes.<br />

Plasma sustainment over many current profile redistribution times (considered the longest time constants <strong>for</strong> the core plasma)<br />

without disruptions and with acceptable transients.<br />

Table 1. High-per<strong>for</strong>mance fusion core targets, and supporting elements.<br />

294

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!