02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• techniques and instruments to accurately measure and reduce impurities that deter<br />

clearance of in-vessel components.<br />

• advanced radiation-resistant remote handling equipment capable of handling sizable<br />

components with high doses > 10,000 sv/h.<br />

• 3-d codes that map the activation source term around the torus.<br />

• efficient detritiation system capable of removing and handling the majority of tritium<br />

from activated materials.<br />

• <strong>Fusion</strong>-specific clearance limits issued by legal authorities; and recycling and clearance<br />

infrastructure and market.<br />

integration of the materials life cycle management strategy into overall fusion development pathways<br />

will identify additional research needs.<br />

REliaBility, availaBility, MaiNtaiNaBility, aNd iNSpEctaBility (RaMi)<br />

introduction<br />

to successfully harness fusion energy, one must have a product that will operate reliably, with acceptable<br />

brief downtimes <strong>for</strong> maintenance. demo is the device on which the per<strong>for</strong>mance expectations<br />

<strong>for</strong> future fusion reactors will be based, including its reliability and maintenance characteristics.<br />

demo must demonstrate a high enough availability <strong>for</strong> power producers to commit to<br />

building a commercial fusion plant. it is not reasonable <strong>for</strong> power producers to expect an ultimate<br />

fusion power plant availability of 80% or more if demo cannot demonstrate an availability of<br />

50% or greater. The Priorities Panel recognized the importance of achieving high availability on<br />

demo with the statement that it must:<br />

Demonstrate the productive capacity of fusion power and validate economic assumptions about<br />

plant operations by rivaling other electrical energy production technologies.<br />

achieving 50% availability on demo would be a huge accomplishment. The fission area started<br />

with numerous nuclear facilities and the early reactors typically had an availability of 60% or less.<br />

it took a number of decades and iterations in design <strong>for</strong> the technologies and operating procedures<br />

to mature and allow the achievement of the 90% availability found in the Us today.<br />

in the fusion case, the development path runs from iteR to demo, and demo is more demanding<br />

than iteR in a number of regards, notably:<br />

• The availability must increase by 5 to 10 times.<br />

• The heat and neutron fluxes are doubled.<br />

• The neutron fluence will be more than an order of magnitude greater.<br />

in addition, fusion plants will be more complex than fission plants, requiring many complex systems<br />

with remote handling: <strong>for</strong> example, blankets, divertors, plasma heating and current drive<br />

systems, and plasma diagnostics. as was the case in fission development, fusion will require a<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!