02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proposed actions:<br />

1. conduct two quasi-symmetric experiments spanning a broad range of internal plasma<br />

current, with plasma parameters sufficient to demonstrate low collisionality, disruptionfree<br />

operation at high plasma pressure. examine the merits of completing ncsX as part<br />

of this ef<strong>for</strong>t. expand ef<strong>for</strong>ts in non-axisymmetric theory and computation to develop<br />

predictive models of Qs confinement. extend the understanding of Qs plasmas to nearburning<br />

conditions.<br />

2. investigate quasi-symmetric configurations with simpler and maintainable magnet<br />

systems.<br />

3. design 3-d divertors compatible with Qs geometry. integrate with 3-d coil simplification.<br />

4. explore the addition of 3-d shaping to other magnetic configurations.<br />

Scientific and technical <strong>Research</strong><br />

a fusion power system that operates continuously without frequent destructive off-normal events<br />

is a desirable goal. stellarator devices already demonstrate sustained plasma per<strong>for</strong>mance without<br />

abrupt terminations or transients 1 . They also achieve good confinement of high-density plasmas,<br />

typically at temperatures lower than in tokamaks, but not far below that required <strong>for</strong> fusion<br />

applications.<br />

The geometry of the stellarator is an example of 3-d magnetic shaping. The magnetic fields confining<br />

the plasma do not possess symmetry in the toroidal direction, as nominally exhibited in<br />

tokamaks and most other fusion plasma devices. The 3-d approach produces the necessary helical<br />

magnetic field with magnet coils located outside the plasma. an internal toroidal plasma current<br />

is not required, thus avoiding the need <strong>for</strong> auxiliary current-drive systems and rapid control<br />

of the current and pressure profiles to maintain stability. in addition to providing rotational<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>m (parameter measuring the helicity of the confining field), 3-d shaping also provides<br />

control over global and local shear and curvature of the field, the magnetic well depth, the location<br />

and fraction of trapped particles, shear of the radial electric field, and plasma viscosity. in<br />

short, 3-d shaping may provide control of not only neoclassical transport and energetic particle<br />

confinement, but also the geometrical parameters that affect turbulent transport and global stability.<br />

however, the conventional stellarator’s lack of symmetry can lead to inadequate confinement<br />

of hot fusion plasmas, and of the energetic charged fusion products in particular. Remarkably,<br />

3-d magnetic configurations can be designed to be quasi-symmetric to reduce such losses.<br />

even though the magnetic field of the Qs stellarator plasma remains three-dimensional, the confinement<br />

of plasma particles within it may be similar to that of an axisymmetric device such as a<br />

tokamak. a Qs stellarator fusion system would thus operate steady state, without threat of disruption,<br />

with comparatively few control needs — and with adequate confinement of energetic fusion<br />

products.<br />

1 Presently, stellarators do not exhibit disruptions in normal operation. In contrast to tokamaks,<br />

pressure limiting behavior is not found to terminate the discharge. Nonetheless, stellarator plasmas<br />

can be abnormally terminated by radiative decay of the plasma energy triggered by excessive density<br />

or material falling into the discharge from the wall. In both of these cases, the discharge decays on the<br />

relatively long scale of an energy confinement time.<br />

370

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!