02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• development and benchmarking of 2-d and 3-d models <strong>for</strong> disruption dynamics,<br />

including electromagnetic and thermal loads, runaway electrons, wall interaction, etc.<br />

• Theoretical and numerical stability modeling, including time-dependent scenario<br />

modeling, to improve capabilities <strong>for</strong> disruption prediction.<br />

• development and benchmarking of real-time energy balance and transport analysis, <strong>for</strong><br />

early warning of impurity accumulation and other possible disruption precursors.<br />

• development of real-time stability calculations, to warn of proximity to stability limits.<br />

• development of direct, real-time determination of plasma stability through “active mhd<br />

spectroscopy” (mhd damping rate measurement by exciting the mode at low amplitude).<br />

• development of diagnostics and real-time analysis <strong>for</strong> identification of a growing<br />

instability at amplitude well below the threshold <strong>for</strong> disruption.<br />

• development and testing in present devices of sensors that can provide the required<br />

measurements <strong>for</strong> disruption prediction in a long-pulse, nuclear environment.<br />

avoidance of disruptions<br />

disruption avoidance includes both passive and active techniques to avoid instabilities. The rapid<br />

growth rate of many ideal mhd instabilities means that their stability limits must be detected<br />

and avoided well ahead of the onset. on the other hand, normal operation may lie beyond passive<br />

stability limits such as those <strong>for</strong> the neoclassical tearing mode or the resistive wall kink mode;<br />

these cases require active stabilization of the plasma. The disruption predictors described in the<br />

preceding list <strong>for</strong>m the input to these passive and active controls.<br />

key research steps include:<br />

• modeling and experimental benchmarking of control strategies to steer the operating<br />

point away from an impending instability, without approaching other operating limits.<br />

• modeling and experimental benchmarking of control strategies to recover normal<br />

operation in the event of an instability or another potential disruption-inducing event.<br />

• modeling and experimental benchmarking of strategies <strong>for</strong> recovery of normal operation<br />

in the event of an off-normal condition caused by component failure or human error, and<br />

specification of operating practices that minimize such events.<br />

• development of actuators capable of modifying the pressure, current density, and rotation<br />

profile with minimal auxiliary power, and suitable <strong>for</strong> use in a nuclear environment.<br />

• modeling and experimental benchmarking of active stability control using actuators such<br />

as localized current drive and non-axisymmetric coils.<br />

• development of high-bandwidth coils <strong>for</strong> mhd spectroscopy and active feedback control,<br />

suitable <strong>for</strong> use in a nuclear environment.<br />

• assessment of the impact of implementing disruption prediction and avoidance<br />

techniques, consistent with iteR and demo requirements on fusion power production.<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!