02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Research</strong> Requirements<br />

in this section, a brief review of major issues and gaps, identified by the Priorities, Gaps and opportunities<br />

Panel and by ReneW panels, is given <strong>for</strong> each panel. most importantly, the research<br />

required to address these challenges is assessed, both in terms of the quantitative targets that<br />

should be met, and the set of priority activities and tools – theory, computational, experimental<br />

and technological – that will be needed. These requirements <strong>for</strong>m the basis of ReneW Thrusts, as<br />

briefly outlined later in this chapter and described in more detail in Part ii of the Report.<br />

MEaSuREMENt: additioNal RESEaRch REquiREMENtS<br />

Overall goal: Make advances in sensor hardware, procedures and algorithms <strong>for</strong> measurements of<br />

all necessary plasma quantities with sufficient coverage and accuracy needed <strong>for</strong> the scientific mission,<br />

especially plasma control.<br />

The ability to make accurate measurements on hot magnetically confined plasmas has driven<br />

much of the understanding and progress to date in this field. accurate measurements are presently<br />

routinely used both <strong>for</strong> improving our basic understanding of plasma behavior and <strong>for</strong> facilitating<br />

control of those plasma quantities <strong>for</strong> which control “actuators” exist. as we proceed beyond<br />

iteR, toward creating steady-state high-per<strong>for</strong>mance burning plasmas, there are additional major<br />

challenges <strong>for</strong> making the necessary measurements. (Please refer to the extended discussion of<br />

research opportunities <strong>for</strong> measurements in chapter 1. since the motivations <strong>for</strong> measurement<br />

capability are the same <strong>for</strong> these two Themes in many cases, we will not repeat the shared motivations<br />

here.) beyond iteR, the environmental hazards <strong>for</strong> diagnostics close to steady-state burning<br />

plasmas are much greater and more daunting than <strong>for</strong> the iteR plasmas, e.g.,<br />

• two orders of magnitude higher fluence than iteR; flux 3-4 x that of iteR.<br />

• higher wall temperature: up to 650° c vs 240° c.<br />

• Possibility of liquid metal walls.<br />

We can better appreciate the increased challenges when we estimate the lifetimes of various components<br />

and diagnostics in such an environment. if we consider only the radiation-induced effects<br />

on components, place them in the equivalent locations as in iteR, and use present-day technology,<br />

then we find that the component lifetimes in a full-power demo-like environment are<br />

predicted to be:<br />

• ~ 13 weeks <strong>for</strong> magnetic sensors.<br />

• ~ 1 week <strong>for</strong> bolometers.<br />

• ~ a few hours <strong>for</strong> vacuum ultraviolet (vUv) windows.<br />

• ~ a few hours <strong>for</strong> pressure gauges.<br />

These lifetimes are unacceptable, and significant development and careful design are required so<br />

that the necessary measurement capability is maintained <strong>for</strong> these steady-state, more self-organized,<br />

burning plasmas. additionally, we must at present judge the use of optical diagnostics as<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!