02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scientific Issues and research requirements<br />

Three primary challenges need to be addressed in the iteR era: (1) <strong>for</strong>mation and stability in the<br />

fusion-plasma regime, (2) transport and energy confinement, and (3) efficient current drive and<br />

flux sustainment. The FRc and spheromak operate in significantly different physics regimes, so<br />

the issues and <strong>Research</strong> Requirements <strong>for</strong> the two configurations are discussed separately. additional<br />

sections consider diagnostics, theory and modeling, and reactor studies <strong>for</strong> cts. tables 3<br />

and 4 at the end of the section summarize the needed facilities and the theory and codes to handle<br />

the research requirements discussed below.<br />

Connections to Broader Science<br />

The cts are closely coupled to a wide range of broader science. They extend fusion plasma science<br />

to very low aspect ratio and minimal external magnetic field, with no toroidal field coils. The FRc<br />

has no toroidal field in the ideal limit, and the magnetic winding (“safety”) factor of the spheromak<br />

lies between the tokamak and RFP. a magnetic dynamo drives the spheromak toward a sel<strong>for</strong>ganized<br />

state in a complementary way to the RFP; in both, this science is closely related to processes<br />

in space and astrophysics. much of the research is done in universities and the configurations<br />

lend themselves to the “discovery science,” which may provide trans<strong>for</strong>mational ideas in the<br />

search <strong>for</strong> fusion energy.<br />

FRC<br />

StabiLity at LaRgE S: aCHiEVE gLObaL StabiLity at LaRgE S in LOW<br />

COLLiSiOnaLity FRCs. (S IS THE NUMBER OF ION LARMOR RADII BETWEEN THE<br />

CENTRAL FIELD NULL AND THE SEPARATRIX)<br />

The highest priority issue <strong>for</strong> the FRc is maintaining stability as the size is scaled up and the plasma<br />

becomes more mhd-like. in the largest theta-pinch FRc, the large s experiment (lsX), hot, highdensity<br />

stable FRcs were <strong>for</strong>med with s up to 4, but s ~ 20 or more will likely be needed <strong>for</strong> reactors.<br />

cold plasmas in ssX had s ~ 10 and were unstable at slower than mhd growth rates. The most worrisome<br />

FRc instability, the n=1 axial tilt, is external in oblate FRcs and can be stabilized by closefitting<br />

conducting walls or strong external field shaping. in prolate FRcs the mhd-tilt is internal,<br />

and other stabilizing means are needed. experiments and simulations to address this issue can be<br />

handled in part by existing facilities and codes, but their capability falls short of the requirements to<br />

resolve it. The limitations of existing simulations and experiments constitute a major research gap.<br />

research requirements<br />

new facilities and/or significant upgrades of existing facilities and extended or new codes will be<br />

needed. The parameters of the required experimental facilities include:<br />

• low-collisionality FRc plasmas with sufficient flux to confine fast ions, ~ 20-50 mWb.<br />

• efficient heating and current drive methods.<br />

• Fast ion creation at mid to lower 10 19 m -3 densities, possibly by neutral beam injection, to<br />

generate large fast ion-ring currents <strong>for</strong> stabilizing effects and <strong>for</strong> current drive if needed.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!