02.08.2013 Views

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

Research Needs for Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences - US Burning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The key areas in which new knowledge is required are:<br />

• integration of high b (normalized plasma pressure) per<strong>for</strong>mance with good confinement<br />

and without transient events; understanding the physics underlying the benign nature of<br />

pressure limits in stellarators, and the impact of pressure-driven currents on maintaining<br />

quasi-symmetry.<br />

• demonstration of the fundamental benefit predicted of Qs: tokamak-like confinement of<br />

energetic ions in high-temperature, collisionless plasmas.<br />

• Understanding of reduced viscous damping of plasma flows in Qs plasmas and its relation<br />

to higher plasma confinement through suppression of plasma turbulence, similar to<br />

tokamaks.<br />

• control of impurity accumulation and helium ash expulsion. despite predictions that<br />

stellarator plasmas exhibit impurity accumulation, experiments have realized highconfinement<br />

regimes in which impurity confinement is acceptably low. extension of<br />

these results to higher temperature Qs plasmas is required.<br />

• Three-dimensional divertors <strong>for</strong> Qs configurations. validation of 3-d physics models of<br />

divertor per<strong>for</strong>mance and development of appropriate coil configurations.<br />

different types of quasi-symmetric 3-d shaping offer different trade-offs. Quasi-axial (Qa) symmetry<br />

is similar to the axisymmetry of the tokamak, and, with finite plasma pressure, gives rise<br />

to moderate levels of self-driven current parallel to the magnetic field (bootstrap current). Quasi-axial<br />

symmetry would provide a direct comparison of quasi-symmetry to true symmetry, and<br />

may answer why the density and pressure-limiting behavior is substantially different in stellarators<br />

and tokamaks. Quasi-helical (Qh) and quasi-poloidal (QP) symmetry exhibit lower levels of<br />

bootstrap current than the tokamak-like Qa configuration, rendering them less susceptible to<br />

current-driven instabilities and the need <strong>for</strong> external control.<br />

coordinated pursuit of both the low (Qh, QP) and moderate current Qa approaches would establish<br />

the efficacy of Qs compared to true symmetry, and determine the magnitude of stellarator<br />

3-d shaping required to provide stable sustainment with finite plasma current. Results from<br />

these experiments combined with theory would in<strong>for</strong>m the choice of the optimal type of quasisymmetry<br />

<strong>for</strong> a single per<strong>for</strong>mance extension device.<br />

key research steps to provide the requisite knowledge include:<br />

• construction and operation of two intermediate-scale experiments: a Qa device with<br />

moderate bootstrap current and a Qh or QP experiment with low bootstrap current. both<br />

experiments would have sufficient pulse length and heating power to evaluate b-limits at<br />

low collisionality to compare with theory. The two devices differ significantly in the details<br />

of their magnetic configuration, such as field line curvature, shear, and trapped particle<br />

fractions, allowing comparative tests of turbulent transport, impurity transport, and density<br />

limits. The two experiments could also differ in the magnet coil and 3-d divertor design.<br />

372

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!