Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2.0 List of Commenters and Response to Comments 2.1 List of Commenters The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Aegis Senior Living Continuing Care Retirement Community - Fountaingrove Lodge Project (Fountaingrove Lodge Project, or the Project) was circulated for review by the public and agencies for 45 days. The 45-day comment period ran through July 28, 2008. Numerous written comments were submitted to the City of Santa Rosa (City) during this review period. In addition, a public hearing was held on July 24, 2008 to take verbal comments from members of the public. The written and verbal comments received are as follows: • Aegis Living • Elizabeth Anderson and Thomas Toth, MD • Linda Barr • Ed Bellone • Annette Cooper • Allen T. Daugaard • Dr. Susan L. Dibble and Dr. Jeanne F. DeJoseph • Skip Epperly (Advocates for Responsible Development) • Fountaingrove Ranch Master Association (FRMA) • Thomas and Judith Glenn • Kyra Janssen • Jim Johnson • Kirt and Brenda Kisling • Joseph Magagna • Edward Margason • Henry McGuckin (letter dated July 18, 2008) • Henry McGuckin (letter dated July 25, 2008) • Carmen McReynolds, M.D. • Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) • Dewey Nelson (letter dated July 17, 2008) • Dewey Nelson (letter dated July 19, 2008) • Dewey Nelson (letter dated July 22, 2008) • Dewey Nelson (letter dated July 28, 2008) • Dewey Nelson (letter dated July 31, 2008) • Ryan and Sheri Newman • North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (NCRWQCB) • Lynn and William Rood • Larry Scharf ES092008001PHX\BAO\082970001 2-1
Page 1: Aegis Senior Living Continuing Care
Page 4 and 5: CONTENTS Response to Comment Letter
Page 6 and 7: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS HFC hydr
Page 8 and 9: 1.0 INTRODUCTION were accepted. A p
Page 12 and 13: 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE
Page 26 and 27: ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_public
Page 60 and 61:
ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_public
Page 62 and 63:
2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
SCHARF - 3 ES082008001BAO_Fountaing
Page 144 and 145:
SCIGLIANO - 1 ES082008001BAO_Founta
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 187:
3.0 Errata and Revisions This secti
Page 191:
2.0 Project Description This sectio
Page 195:
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION use is loca
Page 199 and 200:
3.3 AIR QUALITY Federal Regulations
Page 201 and 202:
3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES • Be pre
Page 203 and 204:
3.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207:
Reference: Giblin Associates, Inves
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
3.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Pursuant
Page 219:
4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Repor
Page 222 and 223:
4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPOR
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
show all

Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?