04.08.2013 Views

Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS<br />

Response to Comment Letter from North Coast Regional Water Quality Control<br />

Board (NCRWQCB)<br />

Note: Response numbers correspond to comment numbers labeled in the margin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

letter.<br />

1) The <strong>City</strong> acknowledges the RWQCB’s support <strong>of</strong> the Draft EIR and “the very<br />

positive programs and improvements” suggested in it. The <strong>City</strong> also acknowledges<br />

the RWQCB’s concerns about potential significant impacts to water quality.<br />

Potential impacts to water quality are addressed in Section 3.8.3 <strong>of</strong> the Draft EIR and<br />

include one potentially significant impact, <strong>Impact</strong> 3.8-2, Construction and operation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Project could increase pollutants in stormwater run<strong>of</strong>f. Mitigation Measures 3.8.2,<br />

Comply with all applicable State and Local Regulations for stormwater will minimize<br />

water quality impacts from stormwater run<strong>of</strong>f and fully mitigate this potential<br />

impact. Mitigation measures shall include the preparation <strong>of</strong> SWPPP and a SUSMP,<br />

as discussed in the Draft EIR. These plans will specify site specific management<br />

activities to be implemented both during and after construction.<br />

2) The <strong>City</strong> understands that a Mitigation and Monitoring Plan describing the process<br />

that has been or will be taken to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss <strong>of</strong> or<br />

significant adverse impacts to beneficial uses <strong>of</strong> waters <strong>of</strong> the State should be<br />

included in the submittal <strong>of</strong> any permit applications. See Response to Comment<br />

NCRWQCB-3 for additional information concerning potential impacts to State<br />

waters within the Study Area.<br />

3) The <strong>City</strong>’s zoning regulations do not allow construction with 50 feet <strong>of</strong> the creek, so<br />

the Piner Creek buffer zone will be preserved. <strong>Impact</strong> 3.8-2, Construction and operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Project could increase pollutants in stormwater run<strong>of</strong>f, documents the potential<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> development. Mitigation Measure 3.8-2 in the Draft EIR includes<br />

measures to reduce and minimize these impacts. The mitigation measure has been<br />

revised to add a requirement for informational signage for pedestrians walking near<br />

the creek as follows:<br />

Mitigation Measure 3.8-2: Comply with all applicable State and local<br />

regulations for stormwater management.<br />

As described above, compliance with the NPDES General Construction Permit,<br />

<strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Rosa</strong>’s municipal stormwater NPDES permit, the grading ordinance, the<br />

<strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Rosa</strong> Area SUSMP, and the Storm Water Mitigation Plan will minimize any<br />

water quality impacts. Informational signage will be added along Project<br />

pathways located near the creek that describe the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the buffer area<br />

and establish appropriate restrictions.<br />

4) As stated in the Draft EIR, a wetland delineation conducted by WRA in 2006 and<br />

verified by USACE in February 2008 indicated that there are no wetlands or other<br />

waters <strong>of</strong> the U.S., other than Piner Creek, in the Study Area. There will be no direct<br />

impacts to Piner Creek or its associated riparian vegetation. Three man-made<br />

stormwater drainages located adjacent to Thomas Lake Harris Drive were<br />

determined not to be waters <strong>of</strong> the U.S by USACE. Because these drainages are man-<br />

ES092008001PHX\BAO\082970001 2-125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!