Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_publicComments_v3.indd_090408_lho MAGAGNA – 7 MAGAGNA – 8 MAGAGNA – 9 MAGAGNA – 10 file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/mgerut/My%20Documents/Fountain%20Grove/Comment_Letters/Magagna.htm Between the proposed removal of 80% of the Heritage Oak Trees and the removal of various animals from the area, the entire area would be destroyed. It would be a very sad day to allow this to happen. In case of emergency...wildfire or earthquake, how can emergency personnel handle everyone living in the area. I have only lived here one year, but I understand that this would be the fourth residential care facility on the West end of Fountaingrove. Do we really need this project??? When you do approve this project, could you please limit the use of trucks coming and going via the Fountaingrove Parkway to the SOUTHWEST entrance to Thomas Lake Harris drive Thank You file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/mgerut/My%20Documents/Fountain%20Grove/Comment_Letters/Magagna.htm (2 of 2)8/1/2008 2:10:09 PM
Response to Comment Letter from Joseph Magagna 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Note: Response numbers correspond to comment numbers labeled in the margin of the letter. 1) The lead agency (in this case, the City) is responsible for the adequacy and objectivity of the Draft EIR (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15084 (e)). If the lead agency does not prepare the Draft EIR with its own staff, a number of options are provided by the CEQA Guidelines (Section 15084 (d)(1 through 5)). The City contracted directly with an outside consultant to prepare the EIR for the proposed Project. The consultant is not affiliated with the Applicant. Studies prepared by the Applicant were reviewed by the consultant and the City for adequacy. The Draft EIR reflects the City’s independent judgment. The Applicant is reimbursing the City for the costs of the EIR. 2) No medical services will be provided as part of the proposed Project (see Draft EIR p. 2-1). City Code Chapter 21-05.040 (I)(8) considers community care facilities (such as the Project) as a nonresidential land use that provides nonmedical residential care. However, to reduce the City Fire Department’s need to respond to nonmedical emergency calls in community care facilities, Fountaingrove Lodge will provide an Emergency Medical Technician qualified or equivalent personnel 24 hours per day in the main “assisted living” building and Care Center (see Draft EIR Mitigation Measure 3.11-2b on p. 3-132). 3) See above response to Magagna – 3. In general, only residents and their guests will have access to the services and facilities included with the Project. 4) Noise impacts were evaluated in Section 3.10 of the Draft EIR; with mitigation, noise impacts will be less than significant. Also see Master Response Noise. 5) See Master Response Visual Resources for additional detail on accuracy of simulations portraying building height and visual impacts; with mitigation, impacts will be less than significant. For a discussion of a smaller project alternative to the Project, see Response to Comment McGuckin July 18 – 2. As described in Impact 3.1- 3 in the Draft EIR, the Project would add new sources of nighttime security lighting along driveways, in outdoor parking lots, and near building entrances. Conformance to the City of Santa Rosa’s Lighting Design Guidelines and the Principles of Low-impact Lighting Design (see Mitigation Measure 3.1-3), which minimize the amount of light that leaves the site, would reduce impacts to less than significant. 6) As described in Section 3.13.3 of the Draft EIR, the average number of construction workers onsite during any weekday is 97, and they would work from 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Truck deliveries supplying materials would occur as often as four times a day, between 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM. Equipment and materials would be staged in the outside parking areas and the proposed driveways would offer turnaround locations for equipment and transport vehicles. Assuming most construction workers would drive alone, there could be on average 85 to 90 construction worker vehicles entering the site before 7:00 AM and leaving before 4:00 PM. Virtually no construction worker or truck traffic should occur during the AM or PM commute peak periods (from 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM, respectively). Therefore, the ES092008001PHX\BAO\082970001 2-75
Page 1:
Aegis Senior Living Continuing Care
Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS Response to Comment Letter
Page 6 and 7:
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS HFC hydr
Page 8 and 9:
1.0 INTRODUCTION were accepted. A p
Page 11 and 12:
2.0 List of Commenters and Response
Page 13 and 14:
2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23:
Page 27 and 28:
ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_public
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34: 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE
Page 37 and 38: ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_public
Page 45 and 46: Response to Comment Letter from Ed
Page 47 and 48: Response to Comment Letter from Ann
Page 49 and 50: Response to Comment Letter from All
Page 71 and 72: 28) Comment noted. 2.0 LIST OF COMM
Page 73 and 74: Response to Comment Letter from Tho
Page 79 and 80: Response to Comment Letter from Jim
Page 83: ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_public
Page 91 and 92: Response to Comment Letter from Edw
Page 103 and 104: Response to Comment Letter from Car
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Response to Comment Letter from Lar
Page 145 and 146:
Response to Comment Letter from Lyn
Page 147 and 148:
Response to Comment Letter from Ala
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185:
Page 189:
Executive Summary Project The Aegis
Page 193:
Mendocino £¤ 101 0 ± 5 10 Miles
Page 197:
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Swimmin
Page 200 and 201:
TABLE 3.3-1 Ambient Air Quality Sta
Page 202 and 203:
3.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
3.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Bec
Page 217:
3.13 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Spr
Page 221 and 222:
4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPOR
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235:
5.0 References California Board of
show all

Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?