Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_publicComments_v3.indd_090408_lho COOPER – 1 Message From: Galbraith, Joel [JGalbraith@ci.santa-rosa.ca.us] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 8:55 AM To: Gerut, Mary/BAO Subject: FW: Fountaingrove Retirement Development Hearing From: Annette Cooper [mailto:ACooper@KeeganCoppin.com] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:14 PM To: Galbraith, Joel Subject: Fountaingrove Retirement Development Hearing I attended the Public Hearing on Thurs.July 24,2008....I wanted to comment the that I felt the majority of the comments seem to be directed at the Merits of whether this Proposed Site is suitable for development; as opposed to comments as to the merits of this specific project It's important to recognize that the nature of a Planned Development contains many lifestyle resources onsite that keep the residents within that community,and minimize the need to have to go anywhere..thus having positive impact on minimizing the traffic being generated. It's equally important to implement an intelligent plan to meet the needs of the baby boomers as they make their way into retirement....Finally;it's incumbent on the Planning Commission to determine that any opposition taken into consideration MUST be made on the actual merits of the project,and reasonable concerns regarding implementation of the development....It's critical that any opposition based on an antiquated cultural bias toward gender preference is recognized as prejudice,and should not be allowed to stand.....Acceptance of a Senior Gay Housing Project has the potential to attract an upscale cultural class that will have a positive financial impact on this society;with minimal impact on schools,and extended community resources. I realize the City is in an on-going balancing act to meet the growing housing needs of the society,while maintaining a decent quality of life for the community at large.There are many factors that need consideration,and Fountain grove Lodge appears to be meeting most of the criteria for positive housing expansion in our City.Thank you for your time,Annette Cooper...320 Gilbert Dr. Santa Rosa,CA.95405 file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/mgerut/My%20Documents/Fountain%20Grove/Comment_Letters/Cooper.htm8/1/2008 2:10:08 PM
Response to Comment Letter from Annette Cooper 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Note: Response numbers correspond to comment numbers labeled in the margin of the letter. 1) Comment noted. As described in Section 2 of the Draft EIR, the Project objectives include provision of approximately 135 units of community care facility units, provision of quality senior care, and provision of housing for seniors with convenient access to medical care facilities, highways and transportation, retail, and recreation amenities. These objectives support policies and goals in the General Plan that call for projects and services to support the needs of seniors in the City (City of Santa Rosa, 2002). ES092008001PHX\BAO\082970001 2-37
Page 1: Aegis Senior Living Continuing Care
Page 4 and 5: CONTENTS Response to Comment Letter
Page 6 and 7: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS HFC hydr
Page 8 and 9: 1.0 INTRODUCTION were accepted. A p
Page 11 and 12: 2.0 List of Commenters and Response
Page 13 and 14: 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE
Page 23: 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE
Page 27 and 28: ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_public
Page 45: Response to Comment Letter from Ed
Page 49 and 50: Response to Comment Letter from All
Page 71 and 72: 28) Comment noted. 2.0 LIST OF COMM
Page 73 and 74: Response to Comment Letter from Tho
Page 79 and 80: Response to Comment Letter from Jim
Page 85 and 86: Response to Comment Letter from Jos
Page 91 and 92: Response to Comment Letter from Edw
Page 97 and 98:
ES082008001BAO_Fountaingrove_public
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE
Page 103 and 104:
Response to Comment Letter from Car
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Response to Comment Letter from Lar
Page 145 and 146:
Response to Comment Letter from Lyn
Page 147 and 148:
Response to Comment Letter from Ala
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185:
Page 189:
Executive Summary Project The Aegis
Page 193:
Mendocino £¤ 101 0 ± 5 10 Miles
Page 197:
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Swimmin
Page 200 and 201:
TABLE 3.3-1 Ambient Air Quality Sta
Page 202 and 203:
3.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
3.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Bec
Page 217:
3.13 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Spr
Page 221 and 222:
4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPOR
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235:
5.0 References California Board of
show all

Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?