Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...
Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...
Fountaingrove Environmental Impact Report - City of Santa Rosa ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS<br />
Response to Comment Letter from Henry McGuckin (letter dated July 18, 2008)<br />
Note: Response numbers correspond to comment numbers labeled in the margin <strong>of</strong> the<br />
letter.<br />
1) Project impacts on biological resources are discussed in Section 3.4 <strong>of</strong> the Draft EIR;<br />
impacts to oak trees and oak woodland are further detailed in Master Response Oak<br />
Trees and Oak Woodland. No significant impacts to biological resources would<br />
occur as a result <strong>of</strong> Project implementation. <strong>Impact</strong>s to oak and heritage trees would<br />
be less than significant with implementation <strong>of</strong> mitigation, including replanting <strong>of</strong><br />
native trees onsite. Implementation <strong>of</strong> Best Management Practices (BMP), described<br />
in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1c, would protect trees and habitat to be preserved during<br />
construction. As noted in Section 3.4, no direct impacts to Piner Creek would occur<br />
as a result <strong>of</strong> the Project. No wetlands or waters under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the U.S.<br />
Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers (USACE) would be impacted by the Project (USACE, 2008.<br />
February 20 letter to Amy Paravano at WRA on USACE jurisdictional<br />
determination). Potential impacts from construction <strong>of</strong> the Project to nesting birds,<br />
roosting bats, and northwestern pond turtle will be mitigated to a less than<br />
significant level through preconstruction surveys, avoidance, monitoring during<br />
construction, and/or other measures.<br />
2) See response to Comment Epperly-23.<br />
3) Comment noted. As described in Section 2 <strong>of</strong> the Draft EIR, the purpose <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Project is help to meet housing and service needs <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>’s senior community,<br />
consistent with the policies and goals in the General Plan that call for projects and<br />
services to support the needs <strong>of</strong> seniors in the <strong>City</strong>. Specific Project objectives are to<br />
create approximately 135 community care facility units; provide progressive care<br />
and a range <strong>of</strong> services to allow seniors to remain within the community; provide<br />
quality senior care licensed by the state <strong>of</strong> California; provide employee housing that<br />
is affordable to the full-time employees needed to operate the facility; and provide<br />
housing for seniors with convenient access to medical care facilities, highways,<br />
transportation, retail, and recreation amenities. As discussed in Section 3.9 Land Use<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Draft EIR and in Master Response Land Use Compatibility, the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> the site is consistent with the land uses designated in the <strong>City</strong>’s General Plan and<br />
the FRPCD Policy Statement, which was originally adopted in 1972 and amended in<br />
1981 and 1992. Development has been planned for the Project site for several<br />
decades.<br />
ES092008001PHX\BAO\082970001 2-85